Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
95 Imaging
37 Features
28 Overall
33
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 99 x 58 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Released August 2010
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z2000 (14MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z2000 was launched 7 months earlier than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z2000 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-Z2000 scores against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z2000 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z2000 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-Z2000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Casio EX-Z2000
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | EX-Z2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | January 2010 | More recent by 7 months | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z2000 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
EX-Z2000 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z2000 has physical measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has dimensions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the EX-Z2000 against the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z2000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 95 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements only by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z2000 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Casio EX-Z2000 to deliver more detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs more aggressively. The older EX-Z2000 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z2000 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Ricoh |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z2000 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2010-01-06 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 367g (0.81 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 58 x 17mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.7") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $0 | $147 |