Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700
97 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
![Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front Casio Exilim EX-Z33 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33/Casio-EX-Z33-front.jpg)
![Samsung WB700 front Samsung WB700 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Samsung-WB700/Samsung-WB700-front.jpg)
98 Imaging
37 Features
21 Overall
30
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 106g - 95 x 56 x 18mm
- Released August 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched December 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Overview
The following is a extended comparison of the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB700, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the resolutions of the EX-Z33 (10MP) and WB700 (14MP) but they come with the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z33 was unveiled 16 months before the WB700 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-Z33 matches up vs the WB700 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z33 & Samsung WB700. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z33 Gallery & Samsung WB700 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z33 over the Samsung WB700
EX-Z33 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB700 over the Casio EX-Z33
WB700 | EX-Z33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | December 2010 | ![]() | August 2009 | Newer by 16 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB700
EX-Z33 | WB700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Casio EX-Z33 has got outer measurements of 95mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 106 grams (0.23 lbs) and the Samsung WB700 has sizing of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z33 and Samsung WB700 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z33 compared to the WB700.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Samsung-WB700-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z33 and WB700 is 97 and 98 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Samsung-WB700-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very hard to see the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing technical specs. The image below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z33 and WB700.
As you can tell, the two cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Samsung WB700 to deliver greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop images much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z33 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Samsung-WB700-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z33-vs-Samsung-WB700-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z33 vs Samsung WB700 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB700 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z33 | Samsung WB700 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2009-08-31 | 2010-12-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4320 x 3240 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | - |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | () |
Maximal aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 2.80 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 106g (0.23 pounds) | - |
Dimensions | 95 x 56 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-82 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card, Internal | - |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $120 | $300 |