Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR

Portability
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR front
Portability
91 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43

Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Announced February 2010
Fujifilm F600 EXR
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Bump to 12800)
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
  • 215g - 104 x 63 x 33mm
  • Launched August 2011
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Overview

On this page, we are matching up the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm F600 EXR, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and FujiFilm. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and Fujifilm F600 EXR (16MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Fujifilm F600 EXR (1/2") posses totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The EX-Z35 was revealed 17 months earlier than the Fujifilm F600 EXR making them a generation away from each other. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Fujifilm F600 EXR being a Compact camera.

Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z35 scores versus the Fujifilm F600 EXR for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Photography Glossary 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Fujifilm F600 EXR

		

		

			
 EX-Z35 Fujifilm F600 EXR 
Focus manually  Dial accurate focus
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F600 EXR over the Casio EX-Z35

		

		

			
 Fujifilm F600 EXR EX-Z35 
LaunchedAugust 2011February 2010More modern by 17 months
Display dimensions3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm F600 EXR

		

		

			
 EX-Z35 Fujifilm F600 EXR 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen  Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly display  Neither comes with Touch friendly display
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Physical Comparison

		

		

			
When you are aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 comes with external measurements of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Fujifilm F600 EXR has dimensions of 104mm x 63mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z35 versus Fujifilm F600 EXR in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 and the Fujifilm F600 EXR.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR size comparison
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm F600 EXR is 96 and 91 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Generally, its difficult to see the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through specs. The pic here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z35 and Fujifilm F600 EXR.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The EX-Z35 using its smaller sensor will make shooting bokeh harder and the Fujifilm F600 EXR will render greater detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
	
			Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography information
Fujifilm F600 EXR Portrait photography information
27
 you can focus manually
 no manual exposure
 cannot use external flash
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
40
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 delivers RAW formats
 focusing manually not possible
 cannot use external flash
 very small sensor (1/2")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-Z35 as a Street photography camera
 Fujifilm F600 EXR as a Street photography camera
48
 screen does not articulate
 does not have image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
69
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than others in class (215g)
 no articulating screen
 very small sensor (1/2")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography information
Fujifilm F600 EXR Sports photography information
17
 lack of shutter priority mode
 does not have image stabilization
 low megapixels (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks phase detect auto focus
53
 great zoom range (24-360mm  15.0 x zoom)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 provides tracking autofocus
 very small sensor (1/2")
 doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Travel Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Travel photography highlights
Fujifilm F600 EXR Travel photography highlights
52
 has built in flash
 lack of Timelapse recording
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 display is not selfie friendly
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
69
 lighter than others in class (215 grams)
 megapixel count good (16MP)
 built-in flash
 fairly wide (24mm)
 long reach (360mm)
 no Time Lapse recording
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography details
Fujifilm F600 EXR Landscape photography details
28
 you can focus manually
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
 small screen (2.5 inches)
 no manual exposure
 does not have image stabilization
 low megapixels (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lacks RAW files
 lack of Timelapse recording
50
 fairly wide (24mm)
 good sized screen (3")
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
 delivers RAW formats
 focusing manually not possible
 can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 very small sensor (1/2")
 no Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging factors
Fujifilm F600 EXR Vlogging factors
22
 wide angle not the best (36mm)
 sluggish max aperture (f3.1)
 display is not selfie friendly
 does not have image stabilization
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pxls)
 lack of external microphone socket
33
 fairly wide (24mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
 lighter than others in class (215 grams)
 somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 no external mic socket
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Casio EX-Z35 vs Fujifilm F600 EXR Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Fujifilm F600 EXR
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR
General Information
Brand Casio FujiFilm
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Fujifilm FinePix F600 EXR
Class Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2010-02-21 2011-08-11
Physical type Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by Exilim Engine 5.0 EXR
Sensor type CCD EXRCMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.4 x 4.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 30.7mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Max resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Max enhanced ISO - 12800
Lowest native ISO 64 100
RAW support    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
AF touch    
Continuous AF    
AF single    
Tracking AF    
Selective AF    
AF center weighted    
AF multi area    
AF live view    
Face detect AF    
Contract detect AF    
Phase detect AF    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-360mm (15.0x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.5-5.3
Macro focusing range 10cm 5cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.6
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display sizing 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Display technology - TFT color LCD monitor
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 8 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 8.0fps
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Manual mode    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance 3.20 m 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe    
AE bracketing    
White balance bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1920 x 1080 (FHD 30 fps), 1280 x 720 (HD 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), High Speed Movie (80 / 160 / 320 fps)
Max video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG AVI MPEG4
Mic port    
Headphone port    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 124 gr (0.27 pounds) 215 gr (0.47 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 104 x 63 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.5" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 40
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 19.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 10.8
DXO Low light rating not tested 153
Other
Battery ID NP-82 NP-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Auto shutter(Dog, Cat))
Time lapse recording    
Type of storage SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC
Card slots One One
Retail price $99 $230