Clicky

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
96
Imaging
35
Features
14
Overall
26
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Casio EX-Z35
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 64 - 3200
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
  • 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
  • Released February 2010
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview

Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-Z35 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the VR-330 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.

Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z35 grades against the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus VR-330

 EX-Z35 VR-330 
Focus manually Very exact focus

Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-Z35

 VR-330 EX-Z35 
IntroducedFebruary 2011February 2010More modern by 11 months
Display size3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution460k230kSharper display (+230k dot)

Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VR-330

 EX-Z35 VR-330 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison

If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).

Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the VR-330.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison

Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and VR-330.

To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Portrait photography info
Olympus VR-330 Portrait photography info
27
manual focus
manual exposure not available
no external flash support
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
33
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
features face detect focusing
manual focus not available
lack of manual exposure
cannot use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Street photography information
Olympus VR-330 Street photography information
48
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
62
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (158g)
screen does not articulate
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Sports photography info
Olympus VR-330 Sports photography info
17
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
47
long zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
features tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus VR-330 as a Travel photography camera
52
has built in flash
lack of Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution low (12 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
70
lighter than competition in class (158g)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
very long zoom (300mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Landscape photography factors
Olympus VR-330 Landscape photography factors
28
manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
screen is somewhat small (2.5 inch)
manual exposure not available
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (12MP)
small sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
lack of Time Lapse recording
42
quite wide (24mm)
good sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count good (14MP)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
lack of manual exposure
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
lack of Timelapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 Vlogging factors
Olympus VR-330 Vlogging factors
22
wide angle not great (36mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
display isn't selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
lack of external mic support
32
quite wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (158g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
doesn't feature selfie friendly display
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of microphone jack
Photography Glossary

Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VR-330
 Casio Exilim EX-Z35Olympus VR-330
General Information
Manufacturer Casio Olympus
Model Casio Exilim EX-Z35 Olympus VR-330
Category Ultracompact Small Sensor Superzoom
Released 2010-02-21 2011-02-08
Body design Ultracompact Compact
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 TruePic III
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4000 x 3000 4288 x 3216
Maximum native ISO 3200 1600
Lowest native ISO 64 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
AF tracking
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 36-107mm (3.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Max aperture f/3.1-5.6 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus distance 10cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.5" 3"
Display resolution 230k dot 460k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 4 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 3.20 m 4.70 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 1280x720
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 124 gr (0.27 pounds) 158 gr (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model NP-82 LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $99 $220