Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Released February 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z35 was unveiled 11 months earlier than the VR-330 which means that they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus VR-330 being a Compact camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a concise summary of how the EX-Z35 grades against the VR-330 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Olympus VR-330. The full galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Olympus VR-330
EX-Z35 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-Z35
VR-330 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2011 | February 2010 | More modern by 11 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Olympus VR-330
EX-Z35 | VR-330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z35 has got outside dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-Z35 versus the VR-330.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and VR-330 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes purely by checking out specifications. The picture below should provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and VR-330.
To sum up, each of these cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VR-330 to provide extra detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos way more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z35 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Olympus VR-330 |
Category | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2010-02-21 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.70 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-82 | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $99 | $220 |