Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7
96 Imaging
34 Features
14 Overall
26
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Revealed February 2010
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2013
- Older Model is Pentax Q10
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Pentax. The image resolution of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and the Q7 (12MP) is fairly comparable but the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and Q7 (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe EX-Z35 was released 4 years before the Q7 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Pentax Q7 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief view of how the EX-Z35 grades versus the Q7 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 & Pentax Q7. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery & Pentax Q7 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Pentax Q7
| EX-Z35 | Q7 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q7 over the Casio EX-Z35
| Q7 | EX-Z35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2013 | February 2010 | Fresher by 42 months | |
| Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Pentax Q7
| EX-Z35 | Q7 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither has Touch display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Physical Comparison
In case you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to think about its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-Z35 has physical dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q7 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Following is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z35 against the Q7.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z35 and Q7 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to imagine the contrast in sensor sizing merely by seeing technical specs. The photograph here will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z35 and Q7.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical MP but different sensor sizing. The EX-Z35 provides the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult. The older EX-Z35 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-Z35 vs Pentax Q7 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Pentax Q7 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Pentax |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Pentax Q7 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2010-02-21 | 2013-08-08 |
| Body design | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
| Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
| Available lenses | - | 8 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD monitor, wide angle viewing, AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 4.90 m (ISO100/m) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | P-TTL, Red-eye Reduction, Slow-speed Sync, Trailing Curtain Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/2000 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | FullHD(1920x1080, 30fps/25fps/24fps), HD(1280x720,16:9,30fps/25fps/24fps), VGA(640x480,4:3,30fps/25fps/24fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lbs) | 200 gr (0.44 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 shots |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-82 | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (12 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD, SDHC, SDXC and Eye-Fi Card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $99 | $480 |