Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26


64 Imaging
66 Features
70 Overall
67
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 36-107mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 124g - 99 x 57 x 20mm
- Announced February 2010
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 610g - 143 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Previous Model is Sony A65

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sony A68, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Casio and Sony. There exists a huge gap among the resolutions of the EX-Z35 (12MP) and A68 (24MP) and the EX-Z35 (1/2.3") and A68 (APS-C) come with different sensor sizes.

The EX-Z35 was launched 6 years prior to the A68 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z35 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A68 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise view of how the EX-Z35 matches up versus the A68 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-Z35 and Sony SLT-A68. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z35 Gallery and Sony A68 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z35 over the Sony A68
EX-Z35 | A68 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A68 over the Casio EX-Z35
A68 | EX-Z35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | November 2015 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 69 months |
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display dimension | 2.7" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.2") |
Display resolution | 461k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z35 and Sony A68
EX-Z35 | A68 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focusing | ||
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z35 enjoys exterior dimensions of 99mm x 57mm x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) and the Sony A68 has proportions of 143mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") and a weight of 610 grams (1.34 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z35 versus Sony A68 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the EX-Z35 and the A68.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z35 and A68 is 96 and 64 respectively.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image here will offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z35 and A68.
Clearly, both of the cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The EX-Z35 because of its smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF more difficult and the Sony A68 will render more detail utilizing its extra 12MP. Greater resolution will make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more aged EX-Z35 will be behind with regard to sensor technology.

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-Z35 vs Sony A68 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony SLT-A68 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z35 | Sony SLT-A68 |
Type | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2010-02-21 | 2015-11-06 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | Bionz X |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 79 |
Cross focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 36-107mm (3.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | - |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 230k dot | 461k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,440k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.20 m | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Flash off, Auto, Fill-flash, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction, Rear sync, Wireless, High Speed sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 30p, 24p), 1440 x 1080, 640 x 480 |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 pounds) | 610 gr (1.34 pounds) |
Dimensions | 99 x 57 x 20mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.8") | 143 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 79 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 24.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 701 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 510 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-82 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (Yes (2 or 12 sec)) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $99 | $581 |