Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
![Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front Casio Exilim EX-Z400 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-ek-fs.jpg)
![Kodak M590 front Kodak M590 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Kodak-M590/Kodak-M590-front.jpg)
99 Imaging
36 Features
20 Overall
29
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Launched January 2009
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 58 x 15mm
- Released August 2010
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590, both Ultracompact cameras by brands Casio and Kodak. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the M590 (14MP) is pretty comparable but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and M590 (1/3") boast totally different sensor size.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
The EX-Z400 was unveiled 19 months before the M590 which makes them a generation apart from each other. Both the cameras have the same body design (Ultracompact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up vs the M590 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Kodak M590. The full galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Kodak M590 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Kodak M590
EX-Z400 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Kodak M590 over the Casio EX-Z400
M590 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2010 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 19 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Kodak M590
EX-Z400 | M590 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal screen resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-Z400 provides physical dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) whilst the Kodak M590 has dimensions of 97mm x 58mm x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you choose during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z400 vs the M590.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 size comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Kodak-M590-size-comparison.jpg)
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z400 and M590 is 95 and 99 respectively.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Kodak-M590-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing simply by going through a spec sheet. The graphic here might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-Z400 and M590.
As you can see, both of those cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z400 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field easier and the Kodak M590 will show more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 sensor size comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Kodak-M590-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-Z400-vs-Kodak-M590-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-Z400 vs Kodak M590 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak M590 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Kodak |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Kodak M590 |
Category | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2009-01-08 | 2010-08-23 |
Body design | Ultracompact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 4.8 x 3.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 17.3mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | - |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3242 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | () |
Largest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 7.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/1400s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130g (0.29 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 97 x 58 x 15mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-40 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | - |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail price | $0 | $120 |