Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010
95 Imaging
35 Features
25 Overall
31
92 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Introduced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 245g - 98 x 64 x 24mm
- Announced February 2010
- Other Name is mju Tough 8010
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Overview
In this write-up, we are reviewing the Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the 8010 (13MP) is very similar and they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z400 was revealed 13 months prior to the 8010 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Olympus 8010 being a Compact camera.
Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the EX-Z400 grades versus the 8010 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 & Olympus Stylus Tough 8010. The full galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery & Olympus 8010 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Olympus 8010
| EX-Z400 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Olympus 8010 over the Casio EX-Z400
| 8010 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 13 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Olympus 8010
| EX-Z400 | 8010 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 comes with outside measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Olympus 8010 has proportions of 98mm x 64mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z400 versus the 8010.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and 8010 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is very difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements just by reviewing specs. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and 8010.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Olympus 8010 to deliver greater detail because of its extra 1 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images far more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-Z400 vs Olympus 8010 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Olympus Stylus Tough 8010 |
| Also Known as | - | mju Tough 8010 |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-02-02 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 13 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1/2s | 1/4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130 gr (0.29 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 98 x 64 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $600 |
