Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Released January 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Released August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX4, one being a Ultracompact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Casio and Ricoh. The image resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very similar and both cameras provide the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-Z400 was brought out 19 months earlier than the CX4 making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh CX4 being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the EX-Z400 scores against the CX4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh CX4
| EX-Z400 | CX4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Casio EX-Z400
| CX4 | EX-Z400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2010 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 19 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX4
| EX-Z400 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither offers Touch display |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 offers outer dimensions of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") having a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Ricoh CX4 has proportions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh CX4 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z400 and the CX4.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z400 and CX4 is 95 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The visual here may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z400 and CX4.
Plainly, each of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Casio EX-Z400 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The older EX-Z400 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2009-01-08 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 130g (0.29 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-40 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $0 | $211 |