Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
95 Imaging
34 Features
25 Overall
30
88 Imaging
52 Features
37 Overall
46
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F2.6-7.0) lens
- 130g - 95 x 60 x 23mm
- Announced January 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Announced September 2010
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
The following is a in depth review of the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, one is a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Casio and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z400 (12MP) and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) is relatively close but the EX-Z400 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-Z400 was introduced 20 months before the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-Z400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summation of how the EX-Z400 matches up versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-Z400 Gallery and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z400 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z400 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-Z400
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | EX-Z400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | January 2009 | Newer by 20 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Crisper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z400 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
EX-Z400 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z400 has got physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has proportions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") along with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the EX-Z400 against the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to see the contrast in sensor dimensions merely by viewing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z400 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical megapixel count albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The EX-Z400 offers the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower DOF more challenging. The more aged EX-Z400 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z400 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z400 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Class | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2009-01-08 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 2848 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-112mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.6-7.0 | f/2.5 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 1/2 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lb) | 140 grams (0.31 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photos |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-40 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SDHC Memory Card, SD Memory Card, Eye-Fi Wireless Card compatible | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $0 | $566 |