Clicky

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Casio EX-Z800
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 50 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
  • 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
  • Launched August 2010
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Here is a in depth assessment of the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the EX-Z800 (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") use totally different sensor measurements.

Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

The EX-Z800 was revealed 5 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC which means that they are both of a similar generation. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going in to a more detailed comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the EX-Z800 scores against the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-Z800 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Casio EX-Z800

		

		

			
 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC EX-Z800 
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution920k230kCrisper screen (+690k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

		

		

			
 EX-Z800 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedAugust 2010March 2010Similar generation
Manually focus  More exact focus
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen  Neither comes with selfie screen
Touch screen  No Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

		

		

			
In case you're going to carry your camera frequently, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 comes with external dimensions of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") along with a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") having a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached during that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-Z800 and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-Z800 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 96 and 85 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Normally, it can be tough to envision the contrast between sensor sizing only by reading specifications. The graphic underneath might give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-Z800 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-Z800 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Casio EX-Z800 will offer more detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
	
			Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Portrait photography with Casio EX-Z800
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
35
 manual focus
 sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
 manual mode not available
 can't use external flash
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
36
 manual focus
 delivers RAW formats
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Street Comparison
 Casio EX-Z800 as a Street photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Street photography camera
57
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no articulating screen
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
65
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 lighter than competition in class (355 grams)
 no moving screen
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Sports Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 Sports photography highlights
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography highlights
38
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 no shutter priority
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect auto focus
25
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 no liveview
 very slow continuous shooting (2.0 fps)
 megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
 does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
 Casio EX-Z800 as a Travel photography camera
 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC as a Travel photography camera
65
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 flash built-in
 rather wide (27mm)
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
60
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 flash built-in
 relatively wide (24mm)
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 display is not selfie friendly
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Landscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-Z800
Landscape photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
42
 manual focus
 rather wide (27mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
 cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
 small screen (2.7 inches)
 manual mode not available
 small sensor size (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 doesn't have Time Lapse recording
47
 manual focus
 relatively wide (24mm)
 nice screen size (3 inches)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 delivers RAW formats
 fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 no liveview
 megapixel count low (10MP)
 small sensor (1/1.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 Vlogging information
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Vlogging information
29
 rather wide (27mm)
 built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 slow max aperture (f3.2)
 screen isn't selfie friendly
 low quality video (640 x 480 pxls)
 doesn't have mic jack
28
 relatively wide (24mm)
 has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
 lighter than competition in class (355g)
 somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.5)
 display is not selfie friendly
 video quality not great (640 x 480 pixels)
 doesn't have mic support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	

		

			
Casio EX-Z800 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-Z800 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Casio Exilim EX-Z800Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model type Casio Exilim EX-Z800 Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Ultracompact Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2010-08-03 2010-03-18
Physical type Ultracompact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Exilim Engine 5.0 Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Peak resolution 4320 x 3240 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Lowest native ISO 50 100
RAW files    
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
Autofocus continuous    
Autofocus single    
Tracking autofocus    
Selective autofocus    
Center weighted autofocus    
Multi area autofocus    
Autofocus live view    
Face detect autofocus    
Contract detect autofocus    
Phase detect autofocus    
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 27-108mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Maximum aperture f/3.2-5.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 4.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display size 2.7 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch functionality    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter rate - 2.0 frames/s
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance - 4.50 m
Flash modes Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash    
AEB    
WB bracketing    
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video data format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 124 grams (0.27 pounds) 355 grams (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 410 pictures
Type of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-120 -
Self timer Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse feature    
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $150 $349