Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 50 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 124g - 91 x 52 x 20mm
- Introduced August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Revealed January 2013
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung ST150F, former being a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-Z800 (14MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is very close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe EX-Z800 was released 3 years before the ST150F and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-Z800 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung ST150F being a Compact camera.
Before getting right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-Z800 grades against the ST150F in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-Z800 & Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-Z800 Gallery & Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z800 over the Samsung ST150F
EX-Z800 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Casio EX-Z800
ST150F | EX-Z800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2013 | August 2010 | More recent by 29 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z800 and Samsung ST150F
EX-Z800 | ST150F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display resolution | 230k | 230k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
If you are planning to lug around your camera often, you have to factor its weight and size. The Casio EX-Z800 features external measurements of 91mm x 52mm x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") having a weight of 124 grams (0.27 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has specifications of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") having a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-Z800 versus Samsung ST150F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the EX-Z800 compared to the ST150F.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-Z800 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements only by viewing technical specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-Z800 and ST150F.
As you can tell, both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung ST150F to result in greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images more aggressively. The older EX-Z800 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z800 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung ST150F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-Z800 | Samsung ST150F |
Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2010-08-03 | 2013-01-07 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Peak resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 50 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 27-108mm (4.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.9 | f/2.5-6.3 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | QVGA TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, flash off, flash on, red eye reduction | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 × 720 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30 f ps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 124 gr (0.27 lb) | 114 gr (0.25 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 91 x 52 x 20mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | NP-120 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 seconds, 2 seconds, Triple Self-timer) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $150 | $300 |