Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 121g - 90 x 52 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-Z90 (12MP) and the TG-820 iHS (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe EX-Z90 was released 3 years earlier than the TG-820 iHS which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-Z90 grades vs the TG-820 iHS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-Z90 & Olympus TG-820 iHS. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-Z90 Gallery & Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-Z90 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-Z90 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Casio EX-Z90
TG-820 iHS | EX-Z90 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 30 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Crisper screen (+800k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-Z90 and Olympus TG-820 iHS
EX-Z90 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Physical Comparison
When you are going to carry around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-Z90 has physical measurements of 90mm x 52mm x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") with a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs) whilst the Olympus TG-820 iHS has proportions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") and a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Casio EX-Z90 versus Olympus TG-820 iHS in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-Z90 versus the TG-820 iHS.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-Z90 and TG-820 iHS is 96 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes just by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-Z90 and TG-820 iHS.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of photographs though you should always factor the age of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-Z90 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-Z90 vs Olympus TG-820 iHS Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus TG-820 iHS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-Z90 | Olympus TG-820 iHS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2009-08-18 | 2012-02-08 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Digic 4 | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3968 x 2976 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 64 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 1,030 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.00 m | 3.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 121 grams (0.27 lb) | 206 grams (0.45 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 52 x 19mm (3.5" x 2.0" x 0.7") | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 220 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-60 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $150 | $500 |