Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Released September 2010
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Overview
The following is a in-depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the VR-320 (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras offer the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR10 was announced 10 months earlier than the VR-320 and they are of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting right into a in-depth comparison, here is a short summary of how the EX-ZR10 matches up against the VR-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 and Olympus VR-320. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery and Olympus VR-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR10 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Casio EX-ZR10
| VR-320 | EX-ZR10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2011 |  | September 2010 | Newer by 10 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Olympus VR-320
| EX-ZR10 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR10 has got outer dimensions of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") along with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Olympus VR-320 has specifications of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is a front view measurement comparison of the EX-ZR10 versus the VR-320.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR10 and VR-320 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the gap in sensor dimensions simply by looking through specs. The pic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR10 and VR-320.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Olympus VR-320 to provide you with greater detail with its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR10 will be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Olympus VR-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Olympus VR-320 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-09-20 | 2011-07-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 461k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-110 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $190 | $179 |
