Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500
93 Imaging
35 Features
35 Overall
35
![Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10/Casio-EX-ZR10-front.jpg)
![Samsung TL500 front Samsung TL500 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/w300/fronton/Samsung-TL500.jpg)
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 69 x 27mm
- Launched September 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternative Name is EX1
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by competitors Casio and Samsung. The image resolution of the EX-ZR10 (12MP) and the TL500 (10MP) is pretty similar but the EX-ZR10 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") boast totally different sensor dimensions.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The EX-ZR10 was released 3 months after the TL500 and they are of a similar age. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the EX-ZR10 matches up vs the TL500 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 & Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR10 Gallery & Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR10 over the Samsung TL500
EX-ZR10 | TL500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Casio EX-ZR10
TL500 | EX-ZR10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 614k | ![]() | 461k | Clearer screen (+153k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL500
EX-ZR10 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2010 | ![]() | July 2010 | Similar age |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focusing | ||
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Touch friendly screen | ![]() | No Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR10 has physical measurements of 102mm x 69mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has measurements of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") and a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR10 and Samsung TL500 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have attached at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR10 and the TL500.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-TL500-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR10 and TL500 is 93 and 88 respectively.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-TL500-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to envision the gap between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture underneath will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR10 and TL500.
Clearly, both of these cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR10 due to its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Casio EX-ZR10 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively.
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-TL500-sensor-size-comparison.png)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
![Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/Casio-Exilim-EX-ZR10-vs-Samsung-TL500-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Casio EX-ZR10 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR10 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2010-09-20 | 2010-07-09 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 461 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.20 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176 gr (0.39 pounds) | 386 gr (0.85 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 69 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.7" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-110 | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $190 | $527 |