Clicky

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
46
Overall
40
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 front
 
Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III front
Portability
80
Imaging
55
Features
75
Overall
63

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR100
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
  • Released July 2011
Olympus E-M10 III
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 200 - 25600
  • Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
  • Revealed August 2017
  • Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
  • New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview

Below is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The EX-ZR100 was introduced 7 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus E-M10 III

 EX-ZR100 E-M10 III 

Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Casio EX-ZR100

 E-M10 III EX-ZR100 
RevealedAugust 2017July 2011More recent by 74 months
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen
Screen resolution1040k461kClearer screen (+579k dot)
Touch screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-M10 III

 EX-ZR100 E-M10 III 
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen size3"3"Same screen size
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the E-M10 III.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and E-M10 III is 92 and 80 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and E-M10 III.

To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR100 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 Portrait photography advice
Olympus E-M10 III Portrait photography advice
29
focusing manually
cannot use external flash
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
73
you can focus manually
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with face detection focus
exports RAW formats
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 as a Street photography camera
Olympus E-M10 III as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (204 grams)
no articulating screen
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
77
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
supports touch focus
above average ISO range (25,600)
heavier than average (410 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Sports photography with Olympus E-M10 III
46
incredible zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
high fps (40.0 frames per second)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers tracking focus
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
69
silent shutter (1/16,000s)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
comes with tracking autofocus
lacks phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR100
Travel photography with Olympus E-M10 III
64
lighter than competition (204g)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great zoom (300mm)
does not have Timelapse function
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not have a selfie friendly display
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
67
supports touch focus
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
built-in flash
heavier than average (410 grams)
screen is not selfie friendly
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-M10 III as a Landscape photography camera
43
focusing manually
fairly wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
MP count low (12MP)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
does not have Timelapse function
80
you can focus manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
screen is a decent size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (Four Thirds)
above average ISO range (25,600)
exports RAW formats
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR100 Vlogging highlights
Olympus E-M10 III Vlogging highlights
33
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (204g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
does not have a selfie friendly display
does not have microphone support
32
screen is touchscreen
image stabilization (Sensor based 5-axis)
comes with face detection focus
video resolution high (3840 x 2160 resolution)
screen is not selfie friendly
missing external mic socket
heavier than average (410g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-M10 III
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR100Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
General Information
Make Casio Olympus
Model type Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Entry-Level Mirrorless
Released 2011-07-19 2017-08-31
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip Exilim Engine HS TruePic VIII
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 17.4 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 226.2mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3
Highest resolution 4000 x 3000 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 3200 25600
Min native ISO 100 200
RAW data
Min boosted ISO - 100
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detection autofocus
Contract detection autofocus
Phase detection autofocus
Total focus points - 121
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 24-300mm (12.5x) -
Max aperture f/3.0-5.9 -
Amount of lenses - 107
Crop factor 5.8 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Tilting
Screen diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Screen resolution 461 thousand dots 1,040 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology Super Clear TFT color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.62x
Features
Lowest shutter speed 15 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Highest silent shutter speed - 1/16000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 40.0fps 8.6fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 5.80 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-eye Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Highest flash synchronize - 1/250 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 3840x2160
Video file format H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 204g (0.45 lb) 410g (0.90 lb)
Physical dimensions 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 330 photos
Battery type - Battery Pack
Battery ID - BLS-50
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported)
Card slots One One
Price at launch $300 $650