Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III
92 Imaging
36 Features
46 Overall
40
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Revealed August 2017
- Earlier Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- New Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
Below is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Casio and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the EX-ZR100 (1/2.3") and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR100 was introduced 7 years earlier than the E-M10 III and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summation of how the EX-ZR100 grades against the E-M10 III in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Olympus E-M10 III
EX-ZR100 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Casio EX-ZR100
E-M10 III | EX-ZR100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2017 | July 2011 | More recent by 74 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 461k | Clearer screen (+579k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Olympus E-M10 III
EX-ZR100 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen size | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR100 provides physical measurements of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Analyze the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the E-M10 III.
Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and E-M10 III is 92 and 80 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading specifications. The photograph below might provide you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR100 and E-M10 III.
To sum up, the 2 cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR100 having a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus E-M10 III will offer extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Min boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 121 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Highest silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 204g (0.45 lb) | 410g (0.90 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 330 photos |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $300 | $650 |