Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620
92 Imaging
35 Features
46 Overall
39
94 Imaging
34 Features
13 Overall
25
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 204g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Released July 2011
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-175mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Released February 2009
- Other Name is PL65
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Overview
Below is a extensive analysis of the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR100 (12MP) and the SL620 (12MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR100 was announced 2 years later than the SL620 and that is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Casio EX-ZR100 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SL620 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR100 matches up vs the SL620 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 & Samsung SL620. The whole galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR100 Gallery & Samsung SL620 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR100 over the Samsung SL620
EX-ZR100 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | February 2009 | More recent by 30 months | |
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Crisper display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL620 over the Casio EX-ZR100
SL620 | EX-ZR100 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR100 and Samsung SL620
EX-ZR100 | SL620 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR100 features outside dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 204 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung SL620 has measurements of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR100 vs the SL620.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR100 and SL620 is 92 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by viewing a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR100 and SL620.
Clearly, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the identical resolution therefore you can expect comparable quality of files but you really should consider the age of the cameras into account. The more recent EX-ZR100 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR100 vs Samsung SL620 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL620 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Samsung |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR100 | Samsung SL620 |
Also Known as | - | PL65 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Released | 2011-07-19 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Exilim Engine HS | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
Full resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 35-175mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 461 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 40.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.60 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 432 x 320 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 64 (480, 1000 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 204 gr (0.45 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $300 | $200 |