Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
86 Imaging
47 Features
43 Overall
45
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 334g - 115 x 72 x 42mm
- Launched May 2010
- Updated by Olympus E-PL1s
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Overview
The following is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Casio and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and E-PL1 (12MP) and the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and E-PL1 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 2 years after the E-PL1 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-PL1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 scores versus the E-PL1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 & Olympus PEN E-PL1. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery & Olympus E-PL1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Olympus E-PL1
EX-ZR1000 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2012 | May 2010 | Newer by 29 months | |
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 461k | 230k | Clearer display (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PL1 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
E-PL1 | EX-ZR1000 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Olympus E-PL1
EX-ZR1000 | E-PL1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Missing Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera often, you need to think about its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR1000 provides exterior measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") and a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) while the Olympus E-PL1 has sizing of 115mm x 72mm x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") along with a weight of 334 grams (0.74 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that moment. Here is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 and the E-PL1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR1000 and E-PL1 is 90 and 86 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to see the gap in sensor dimensions merely by going through a spec sheet. The picture here might give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR1000 and E-PL1.
As you can see, both the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 due to its smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Casio EX-ZR1000 will show extra detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR1000 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Olympus E-PL1 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Olympus PEN E-PL1 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-25 | 2010-05-17 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Truepic V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4032 x 3024 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 461k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | HyperCrystal LCD AR (Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255g (0.56 lb) | 334g (0.74 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 115 x 72 x 42mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 487 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photographs | 290 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BLS-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $572 | $288 |