Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000
90 Imaging
40 Features
53 Overall
45
89 Imaging
63 Features
68 Overall
65
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 255g - 108 x 62 x 37mm
- Released September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 228g - 119 x 65 x 36mm
- Launched November 2013
- Previous Model is Samsung NX1100
- Renewed by Samsung NX3000
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung NX2000, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR1000 (16MP) and the NX2000 (20MP) is fairly similar but the EX-ZR1000 (1/2.3") and NX2000 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR1000 was brought out 14 months before the NX2000 making the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Casio EX-ZR1000 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX2000 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR1000 grades versus the NX2000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX2000. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR1000 Gallery and Samsung NX2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR1000 over the Samsung NX2000
EX-ZR1000 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX2000 over the Casio EX-ZR1000
NX2000 | EX-ZR1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2013 | September 2012 | Newer by 14 months | |
Display sizing | 3.7" | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") | |
Display resolution | 1152k | 461k | Clearer display (+691k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR1000 and Samsung NX2000
EX-ZR1000 | NX2000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial exact focusing | |||
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera often, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR1000 has external measurements of 108mm x 62mm x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 255 grams (0.56 lbs) and the Samsung NX2000 has specifications of 119mm x 65mm x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") along with a weight of 228 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR1000 versus Samsung NX2000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you choose at that time. Below is the front view sizing comparison of the EX-ZR1000 versus the NX2000.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR1000 and NX2000 is 90 and 89 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is hard to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions simply by going over a spec sheet. The picture below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR1000 and NX2000.
As you can see, both of the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The EX-ZR1000 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX2000 will offer you more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a little more aggressively. The more aged EX-ZR1000 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR1000 vs Samsung NX2000 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX2000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR1000 | Samsung NX2000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-09-25 | 2013-11-30 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 21 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3.7 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 1,152k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 255 grams (0.56 pounds) | 228 grams (0.50 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 62 x 37mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.5") | 119 x 65 x 36mm (4.7" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 908 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 shots | 340 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC/ MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $572 | $599 |