Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Released February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Overview
In this article, we will be analyzing the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Nikon S9900, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Casio and Nikon. The image resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the S9900 (16MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR15 was released 4 years prior to the S9900 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR15 matches up versus the S9900 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 and Nikon Coolpix S9900. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery and Nikon S9900 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Nikon S9900
EX-ZR15 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Casio EX-ZR15
S9900 | EX-ZR15 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | January 2012 | Newer by 37 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 461k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Nikon S9900
EX-ZR15 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 has physical measurements of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) while the Nikon S9900 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") along with a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Nikon S9900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use at the time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the S9900.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR15 and S9900 is 93 and 88 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions just by looking through specs. The pic below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR15 and S9900.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same resolution therefore you should expect comparable quality of files though you have to take the release date of the cameras into account. The more aged EX-ZR15 will be behind in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Nikon S9900 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Casio | Nikon |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Nikon Coolpix S9900 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-09 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 25-750mm (30.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.7-6.4 |
Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 461k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 5.20 m | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 176g (0.39 pounds) | 289g (0.64 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 300 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | NP-110 | EN-EL19 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $249 | $300 |