Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Launched January 2012
Olympus 550WP
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-5.0) lens
- 167g - 94 x 62 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2009
- Alternate Name is mju 550WP
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Overview
Following is a in-depth review of the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus 550WP, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Casio and Olympus. There is a large difference among the image resolutions of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and 550WP (10MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe EX-ZR15 was launched 3 years after the 550WP which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple view of how the EX-ZR15 grades vs the 550WP in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Olympus Stylus 550WP. The complete galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Olympus 550WP Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Olympus 550WP
| EX-ZR15 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2009 | More modern by 37 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 461k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+231k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus 550WP over the Casio EX-ZR15
| 550WP | EX-ZR15 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Olympus 550WP
| EX-ZR15 | 550WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR15 enjoys external dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Olympus 550WP has measurements of 94mm x 62mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR15 versus Olympus 550WP in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the 550WP.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR15 and 550WP is 93 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to envision the gap in sensor sizes simply by researching specifications. The picture underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR15 and 550WP.
To sum up, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR15 to result in greater detail utilizing its extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also let you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more modern EX-ZR15 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Portrait photography information
Olympus 550WP Portrait photography information
has manual focus
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual mode
external flash not possible
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Street photography info
Olympus 550WP Street photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
screen does not articulate
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
fixed screen
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Sports photography info
Olympus 550WP Sports photography info
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
supports tracking focus
better than average battery (325 CIPA)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
low max shutter speed (1/1,000 seconds)
no shutter priority
megapixel count low (10 megapixels)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Travel photography with Olympus 550WP
better than average battery (325 shots)
MP count decent (16MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse mode
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
environment sealing
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse mode
megapixel count low (10MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus 550WP as a Landscape photography camera
has manual focus
pretty wide (28mm)
screen size is decent (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (325 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual mode
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
image stabilization (Digital)
environment sealing
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
manual mode not available
megapixel count low (10MP)
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Timelapse mode
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Casio EX-ZR15
Vlogging with Olympus 550WP
pretty wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no mic jack
image stabilization (Digital)
wide angle not the best (38mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is not selfie friendly
low res video (640 x 480 pxls)
doesn't have microphone jack
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Olympus 550WP Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus 550WP | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Casio | Olympus |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Olympus Stylus 550WP |
| Also called | - | mju 550WP |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-09 | 2009-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.0 |
| Macro focusing range | 2cm | 7cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Screen resolution | 461 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, Fill-in, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 176 grams (0.39 pounds) | 167 grams (0.37 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 94 x 62 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | xD-Picture Card, microSD, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $249 | $399 |