Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F
Portability
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
93 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
Portability
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
93 Imaging
38 Features
44 Overall
40
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR15
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-196mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 176g - 102 x 59 x 27mm
- Introduced January 2012
Samsung WB250F
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 226g - 106 x 62 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2013
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB250F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Casio and Samsung. The resolution of the EX-ZR15 (16MP) and the WB250F (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe EX-ZR15 was released 12 months prior to the WB250F so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR15 scores vs the WB250F with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 & Samsung WB250F. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR15 Gallery & Samsung WB250F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR15 over the Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR15 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 461k |  | 460k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB250F over the Casio EX-ZR15
| WB250F | EX-ZR15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB250F
| EX-ZR15 | WB250F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera often, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Casio EX-ZR15 comes with physical dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 176 grams (0.39 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB250F has sizing of 106mm x 62mm x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") with a weight of 226 grams (0.50 lbs).
Take a look at the Casio EX-ZR15 and Samsung WB250F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR15 versus the WB250F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR15 and WB250F is 93 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by viewing specifications. The photograph below may provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR15 and WB250F.
Plainly, the two cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR15 to provide you with greater detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older EX-ZR15 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Portrait photography camera
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
provides face detection focusing
no manual control
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
megapixel count good (14MP)
provides face detection autofocus
manual focus not available
external flash not possible
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Street photography highlights
Samsung WB250F Street photography highlights
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others (226g)
screen does not articulate
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung WB250F as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16MP)
provides tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (325 CIPA)
slow frames per second (3.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-432mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
provides tracking autofocus
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 Travel photography advice
Samsung WB250F Travel photography advice
better than average battery pack (325 CIPA)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (28mm)
missing Timelapse recording
does not feature selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
lighter than others (226 grams)
megapixel count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (432mm)
missing Time Lapse function
does not offer selfie friendly display
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Casio EX-ZR15
Landscape photography with Samsung WB250F
you can focus manually
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery pack (325 shots)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
no manual control
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
missing Timelapse recording
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
missing Time Lapse function
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR15 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung WB250F as a Vlogging camera
really wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
provides face detection focusing
high res video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.0)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
missing external microphone jack
relatively wide (24mm)
screen is touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than others (226 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.2)
does not offer selfie friendly display
missing external mic socket
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR15 vs Samsung WB250F Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB250F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR15 | Samsung WB250F |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-01-09 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Exilim Engine 5.0 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-196mm (7.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 461 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 8.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 5.20 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 176g (0.39 lb) | 226g (0.50 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 59 x 27mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 106 x 62 x 22mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 325 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-110 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $249 | $250 |