Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810
Portability
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Portability
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
92 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR400
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 205g - 105 x 59 x 29mm
- Launched January 2013
Olympus TG-810
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 215g - 100 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed August 2011
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Overview
Let's examine more in depth at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-810, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR400 (16MP) and the TG-810 (14MP) is relatively comparable and they enjoy the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe EX-ZR400 was introduced 18 months later than the TG-810 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the EX-ZR400 matches up vs the TG-810 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 & Olympus TG-810. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR400 Gallery & Olympus TG-810 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR400 over the Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR400 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | August 2011 | More recent by 18 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focus |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-810 over the Casio EX-ZR400
| TG-810 | EX-ZR400 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 461k | Sharper screen (+459k dot) |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-810
| EX-ZR400 | TG-810 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR400 enjoys external dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Olympus TG-810 has measurements of 100mm x 65mm x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs).
Look at the Casio EX-ZR400 and Olympus TG-810 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the EX-ZR400 and the TG-810.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR400 and TG-810 is 92 and 92 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by seeing specs. The visual here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR400 and TG-810.
All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can count on the Casio EX-ZR400 to show greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR400 should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Portrait photography features
Olympus TG-810 Portrait photography features
has manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
cannot use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
MP count decent (14MP)
supports face detect autofocus
no manual focus
manual mode not possible
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Street photography with Casio EX-ZR400
Street photography with Olympus TG-810
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
no moving screen
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Sports photography advice
Olympus TG-810 Sports photography advice
excellent zoom range (24-300mm 12.5 x zoom)
max fps high (30.0 frames/s)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
great battery (500 per charge)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
supports tracking focus
environment proofing
very slow continuous shooting (1.0 frames per second)
no shutter priority
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery (220 shots)
no phase detect autofocus
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Travel photography information
Olympus TG-810 Travel photography information
great battery (500 per charge)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
good MP (16MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
great reach (300mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
environment proofing
MP count decent (14MP)
has built in flash
reasonably wide (28mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
not so great battery (220 per charge)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Landscape photography features
Olympus TG-810 Landscape photography features
has manual focus
relatively wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
great battery (500 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
reasonably wide (28mm)
decent sized screen (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
MP count decent (14 megapixels)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
manual mode not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW support
not so great battery (220 shots)
lack of Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR400 Vlogging details
Olympus TG-810 Vlogging details
relatively wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition in class (205g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.0)
display is not selfie friendly
doesn't have mic port
reasonably wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports face detect autofocus
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.9)
doesn't have a selfie friendly screen
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
lack of mic support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Casio EX-ZR400 vs Olympus TG-810 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-810 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR400 | Olympus TG-810 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-01-29 | 2011-08-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | Exilim Engine HS | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 461k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Hypercrystal III Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 30.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (15, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps) 224 x 64 (1000 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 205 grams (0.45 lbs) | 215 grams (0.47 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 105 x 59 x 29mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 100 x 65 x 26mm (3.9" x 2.6" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 500 shots | 220 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, Triple) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $0 | $428 |