Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320
Portability
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
Portability
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
94 Imaging
37 Features
33 Overall
35
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Key Specs
Casio EX-ZR700
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
Olympus TG-320
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-102mm (F3.5-5.1) lens
- 155g - 96 x 63 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Overview
The following is a extended assessment of the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-320, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Waterproof by rivals Casio and Olympus. The resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the TG-320 (14MP) is fairly close and they feature the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe EX-ZR700 was released 13 months after the TG-320 making the cameras a generation away from one another. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a simple summary of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the TG-320 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-320. The complete galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Olympus TG-320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus TG-320
| EX-ZR700 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 13 months |
| Manually focus |  | More precise focusing | ||
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 922k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-320 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| TG-320 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-320
| EX-ZR700 | TG-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither comes with Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 comes with exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus TG-320 has proportions of 96mm x 63mm x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 155 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus TG-320 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the EX-ZR700 versus the TG-320.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and TG-320 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and TG-320.
As you have seen, both cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same resolution. You should anticipate the Casio EX-ZR700 to render more detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The newer EX-ZR700 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Portrait photography information
Olympus TG-320 Portrait photography information
manual focus
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features face detection focusing
no external flash support
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
sensor resolution is decent (14MP)
features face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
can't use external flash
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Street photography highlights
Olympus TG-320 Street photography highlights
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
no moving screen
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lighter than others (155g)
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Sports photography camera
great zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
features tracking autofocus
better than average battery pack (470 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
features tracking focus
environment proof
max fps very slow (1.0 frames/s)
no shutter priority mode
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
low battery pack (150 CIPA)
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 as a Travel photography camera
Olympus TG-320 as a Travel photography camera
better than average battery pack (470 shots)
lighter than competition (222 grams)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (25mm)
very long zoom (450mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
does not have a selfie friendly screen
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
lighter than others (155 grams)
environment proof
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
rather wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
low battery pack (150 CIPA)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Landscape photography information
Olympus TG-320 Landscape photography information
manual focus
reasonably wide (25mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
better than average battery pack (470 CIPA)
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
doesn't have Time Lapse function
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (14 megapixels)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.7 inch)
manual mode not available
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
low battery pack (150 per charge)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Casio EX-ZR700 Vlogging highlights
Olympus TG-320 Vlogging highlights
reasonably wide (25mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detection focusing
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competition (222g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic support
rather wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
features face detect focusing
lighter than others (155g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not have a selfie friendly screen
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic support
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus TG-320 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-320 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus TG-320 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2012-01-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.1 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per second | 1.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 155 grams (0.34 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 96 x 63 x 23mm (3.8" x 2.5" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photos | 150 photos |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $370 | $0 |