Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Succeeded the Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus VR-330, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by manufacturers Casio and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras provide the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR700 was released 2 years later than the VR-330 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the EX-ZR700 grades versus the VR-330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR700 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | January 2013 |  | February 2011 | Fresher by 25 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 922k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Casio EX-ZR700
| VR-330 | EX-ZR700 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Olympus VR-330
| EX-ZR700 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR700 offers exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) whilst the Olympus VR-330 has proportions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Olympus VR-330 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR700 vs the VR-330.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR700 and VR-330 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the EX-ZR700 and VR-330.
As you have seen, both of these cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Casio EX-ZR700 to resolve more detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots way more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR700 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2013-01-29 | 2011-02-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lbs) | 158 gr (0.35 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $370 | $220 |