Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F
91 Imaging
39 Features
53 Overall
44
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c919/1c9190b66ae9d20e63ea1a028964e79ad2a5586f" alt="Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52f91/52f9140fa7006285dc43ba7d1f1fb45d41f5684b" alt="Samsung WB35F front Samsung WB35F front"
93 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Announced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below, we are looking at the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB35F, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the EX-ZR700 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is very similar and they use the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The EX-ZR700 was introduced 11 months prior to the WB35F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the EX-ZR700 matches up against the WB35F for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB35F. The whole galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR700 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR700 over the Samsung WB35F
EX-ZR700 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Casio EX-ZR700
WB35F | EX-ZR700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | January 2014 | ![]() | January 2013 | More recent by 11 months |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR700 and Samsung WB35F
EX-ZR700 | WB35F | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither features Touch display |
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR700 enjoys external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Samsung WB35F has specifications of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
Compare the Casio EX-ZR700 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the EX-ZR700 against the WB35F.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4d346/4d346269053d505acef29f1b993e4b241495bf67" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR700 and WB35F is 91 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f62b2/f62b27a7e6e5562282d525dddbb305ae74d1748d" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F top view buttons comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the EX-ZR700 and WB35F.
As you have seen, both the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements and the exact same megapixels therefore you should expect similar quality of images but you will need to take the release date of the products into consideration. The older EX-ZR700 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e207e/e207ee7abf6407e9d834c2ec1ac417406352209b" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F sensor size comparison"
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ee75c/ee75c4f3ef525c669c0f053fbb097983dce9fe99" alt="Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Casio EX-ZR700 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB35F | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Casio | Samsung |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR700 | Samsung WB35F |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-01-29 | 2014-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.1-6.3 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 922 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 194 grams (0.43 pounds) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | BP70A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | - |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $370 | $130 |