Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410
91 Imaging
40 Features
55 Overall
46


95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Overview
Following is a detailed analysis of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-410, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Casio and Olympus. The image resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the VH-410 (16MP) is very similar and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").

The EX-ZR800 was launched 12 months after the VH-410 and they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the EX-ZR800 matches up vs the VH-410 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus VH-410. The complete galleries are viewable at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus VH-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus VH-410
EX-ZR800 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2013 | ![]() | August 2012 | More modern by 12 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 922k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Casio EX-ZR800
VH-410 | EX-ZR800 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-410
EX-ZR800 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outside dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Olympus VH-410 has proportions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-410 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the VH-410.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the EX-ZR800 and VH-410 is 91 and 95 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's difficult to visualize the difference between sensor sizes just by going over technical specs. The image here may give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and VH-410.
As you have seen, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the exact same MP and you can expect similar quality of images though you need to consider the launch date of the products into consideration. The newer EX-ZR800 provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-410 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VH-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Casio | Olympus |
Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VH-410 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2012-08-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 922k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 lb) | 152 gr (0.34 lb) |
Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | NP-130 | LI-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $186 |