Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Revealed August 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Overview
Here is a extensive overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-515, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Casio and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the image resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and VH-515 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe EX-ZR800 was manufactured 12 months later than the VH-515 so they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 grades versus the VH-515 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Olympus VH-515. The entire galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Olympus VH-515 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Olympus VH-515
| EX-ZR800 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | August 2013 | August 2012 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial accurate focusing | |||
| Display resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper display (+462k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| VH-515 | EX-ZR800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-515
| EX-ZR800 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and size. The Casio EX-ZR800 has got external measurements of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Olympus VH-515 has specifications of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs).
Check the Casio EX-ZR800 and Olympus VH-515 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have attached at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the VH-515.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and VH-515 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to imagine the difference between sensor sizing only by checking a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the EX-ZR800 and VH-515.
Clearly, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Casio EX-ZR800 to give you more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher EX-ZR800 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Olympus VH-515 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VH-515 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Casio | Olympus |
| Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Olympus VH-515 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2013-08-07 | 2012-08-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | TruePic III+ |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8-6.5 |
| Macro focus range | 4cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 922 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 2.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 pounds) | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-130 | LI-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $429 | $648 |