Clicky

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

Portability
91
Imaging
40
Features
55
Overall
46
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 front
 
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 front
Portability
88
Imaging
52
Features
37
Overall
46

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs

Casio EX-ZR800
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
  • 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
  • Announced August 2013
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 28mm (F2.5) lens
  • 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
  • Released September 2010
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Casio and Ricoh. There is a large difference among the resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor dimensions.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The EX-ZR800 was introduced 2 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Casio EX-ZR800 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief summary of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 EX-ZR800 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
ReleasedAugust 2013September 2010More recent by 36 months
Display resolution922k920kSharper display (+2k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Casio EX-ZR800

 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 EX-ZR800 

Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5

 EX-ZR800 GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 
Focus manually More precise focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display size3"3"Same display sizing
Selfie screen Lack of selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lack of Touch friendly display

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison

If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Casio EX-ZR800 provides exterior dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has dimensions of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") with a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).

Analyze the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the EX-ZR800 versus the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 size comparison

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 91 and 88 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 top view buttons comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is very hard to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements purely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.

Clearly, each of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The EX-ZR800 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Casio EX-ZR800 will provide you with more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 will have a benefit in sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 sensor size comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Portrait photography highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Portrait photography highlights
44
you can focus manually
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
comes with face detection focus
cannot use external flash
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
57
you can focus manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
features face detection focus
delivers RAW files
no liveview
low megapixels (12MP)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 as a Street photography camera
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 as a Street photography camera
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than competitors (222g)
no articulating screen
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
70
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
lighter than competition in class (140g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Casio EX-ZR800
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
51
long zoom range (25-450mm 18.0 x zoom)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16MP)
comes with tracking autofocus
better than average battery (470 per charge)
slow frames per second (3.0 fps)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect auto focus
32
good sensor size (APS-C)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
no liveview
very slow continuous shooting (5.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (320 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Travel photography information
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Travel photography information
74
better than average battery (470 shots)
lighter than competitors (222g)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (25mm)
long reach (450mm)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
58
lighter than competition in class (140g)
built-in flash
terrible battery life (320 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Landscape Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Landscape photography information
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Landscape photography information
55
you can focus manually
really wide (25mm)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
megapixel count decent (16 megapixels)
better than average battery (470 per charge)
can't change lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
47
you can focus manually
screen size is decent (3 inch)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW files
cannot switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
terrible battery life (320 shots)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 Vlogging highlights
Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Vlogging highlights
34
really wide (25mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
lighter than competitors (222g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
doesn't have external mic port
28
features face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (140g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
 Casio Exilim EX-ZR800Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
General Information
Brand Name Casio Ricoh
Model Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
Type Small Sensor Superzoom Advanced Mirrorless
Announced 2013-08-07 2010-09-21
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by EXILIM Engine HS 3 GR Engine III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 2848
Highest native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 80 200
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-450mm (18.0x) 28mm (1x)
Highest aperture f/3.5-5.9 f/2.5
Macro focus range 4cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 922k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen tech Super Clear TFT color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames/s 5.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.70 m -
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video file format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 222g (0.49 pounds) 140g (0.31 pounds)
Physical dimensions 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 470 shots 320 shots
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-130 DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Price at release $429 $566