Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45
93 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Launched August 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 164g - 114 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2014
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Overview
Below is a in depth overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-20, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by competitors Casio and Ricoh. The resolution of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and the WG-20 (14MP) is fairly similar and both cameras posses the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe EX-ZR800 was brought out 6 months earlier than the WG-20 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the EX-ZR800 scores versus the WG-20 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Ricoh WG-20. The entire galleries are available at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Ricoh WG-20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Ricoh WG-20
| EX-ZR800 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 922k | 230k | Crisper display (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-20 over the Casio EX-ZR800
| WG-20 | EX-ZR800 |
|---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-20
| EX-ZR800 | WG-20 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2013 | February 2014 | Similar age | |
| Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and measurements. The Casio EX-ZR800 offers physical dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-20 has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs).
Check out the Casio EX-ZR800 and Ricoh WG-20 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the WG-20.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the EX-ZR800 and WG-20 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and WG-20.
Clearly, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Casio EX-ZR800 to deliver greater detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images way more aggressively.
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Ricoh WG-20 Specifications
| Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Casio | Ricoh |
| Model type | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Ricoh WG-20 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-08-07 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 4cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1280 x 720 (30p, 15p), 640 x 480 (30p, 15p), 320 x 240 (30p, 15p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 222 grams (0.49 lbs) | 164 grams (0.36 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 114 x 58 x 28mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 470 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | NP-130 | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $429 | $370 |