Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5
91 Imaging
39 Features
55 Overall
45


92 Imaging
33 Features
30 Overall
31
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 222g - 108 x 60 x 31mm
- Released August 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 200g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Overview
Here is a thorough overview of the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony HX5, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Casio and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the EX-ZR800 (16MP) and HX5 (10MP) and the EX-ZR800 (1/2.3") and HX5 (1/2.4") boast totally different sensor measurements.

The EX-ZR800 was announced 3 years later than the HX5 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the EX-ZR800 scores vs the HX5 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5. The whole galleries are provided at Casio EX-ZR800 Gallery & Sony HX5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Casio EX-ZR800 over the Sony HX5
EX-ZR800 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2013 | ![]() | June 2010 | Fresher by 39 months |
Manual focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Screen resolution | 922k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper screen (+692k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony HX5 over the Casio EX-ZR800
HX5 | EX-ZR800 |
---|
Common features in the Casio EX-ZR800 and Sony HX5
EX-ZR800 | HX5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Neither includes Touch screen |
Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and proportions. The Casio EX-ZR800 features outer dimensions of 108mm x 60mm x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs) while the Sony HX5 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 200 grams (0.44 lbs).
Examine the Casio EX-ZR800 versus Sony HX5 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at the time. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the EX-ZR800 and the HX5.

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the EX-ZR800 and HX5 is 91 and 92 respectively.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizing purely by reading specifications. The graphic here will help give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the EX-ZR800 and HX5.
Plainly, the 2 cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The EX-ZR800 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Casio EX-ZR800 will offer you extra detail with its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more recent EX-ZR800 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Casio EX-ZR800 vs Sony HX5 Specifications
Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Casio | Sony |
Model | Casio Exilim EX-ZR800 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX5 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2013-08-07 | 2010-06-16 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | EXILIM Engine HS 3 | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus distance | 4cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 922k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | Super Clear TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.80 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,20,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps), 512 x 384 (30, 240 fps), 224 x 160 (480 fps), 224 x 64 (1000 fps), | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (60, 30fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) | 200 gr (0.44 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 108 x 60 x 31mm (4.3" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 470 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-130 | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 seconds, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait1/portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo/ PRO HG-Duo, optional SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $429 | $275 |