Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST95

Below, we are comparing the Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST95, both Ultracompact digital cameras by rivals Casio and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TRYX (12MP) and ST95 (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The TRYX was unveiled about the same time to the ST95 which means that they are of a similar age. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Ultracompact).

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the TRYX matches up against the ST95 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Casio Exilim TRYX & Samsung ST95. The full galleries are provided at Casio TRYX Gallery & Samsung ST95 Gallery.

For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Casio TRYX enjoys external dimensions of 122mm x 58mm x 15mm (4.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs) and the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).

Check the Casio TRYX vs Samsung ST95 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the TRYX against the ST95.

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TRYX and ST95 is 99 and 99 respectively.

Quite often, it is very hard to picture the contrast between sensor sizes simply by checking specs. The picture below should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TRYX and ST95.

All in all, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung ST95 to resolve greater detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively.