FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4
94 Imaging
37 Features
16 Overall
28
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Raise to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 32-96mm (F2.9-5.2) lens
- 168g - 93 x 60 x 28mm
- Launched January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix AV205
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the FujiFilm AV200 versus Ricoh WG-4, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands FujiFilm and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the AV200 (14MP) and the WG-4 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe AV200 was released 4 years before the WG-4 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a complete comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the AV200 matches up against the WG-4 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix AV200 and Ricoh WG-4. The complete galleries are provided at FujiFilm AV200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm AV200 over the Ricoh WG-4
| AV200 | WG-4 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the FujiFilm AV200
| WG-4 | AV200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | February 2014 |  | January 2011 | More recent by 37 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm AV200 and Ricoh WG-4
| AV200 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Absent Touch screen |
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and size. The FujiFilm AV200 provides outside dimensions of 93mm x 60mm x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Compare the FujiFilm AV200 versus Ricoh WG-4 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the AV200 versus the WG-4.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the AV200 and WG-4 is 94 and 90 respectively.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing specifications. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the AV200 and WG-4.
Plainly, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You should count on the Ricoh WG-4 to offer you extra detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs far more aggressively. The older AV200 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm AV200 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix AV200 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix AV205 | - |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Maximum boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 32-96mm (3.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.9-5.2 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 4s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/1400s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 168 grams (0.37 pounds) | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 93 x 60 x 28mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 photographs | 240 photographs |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $0 | $330 |
