FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
72 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Raise to 12800)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.5-5.3) lens
- 215g - 104 x 59 x 33mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternate Name is FinePix F305EXR
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by brands FujiFilm and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the F300EXR (12MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty comparable but the F300EXR (1/2") and FZ35 (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe F300EXR was manufactured very close to the FZ35 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the FujiFilm F300EXR being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summation of how the F300EXR scores versus the FZ35 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm F300EXR Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm F300EXR over the Panasonic FZ35
| F300EXR | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the FujiFilm F300EXR
| FZ35 | F300EXR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More precise focusing |
Common features in the FujiFilm F300EXR and Panasonic FZ35
| F300EXR | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | July 2010 | July 2010 | Same generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm F300EXR has got outer measurements of 104mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") along with a weight of 215 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") and a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the F300EXR versus the FZ35.

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the F300EXR and FZ35 is 91 and 72 respectively.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its tough to imagine the difference in sensor sizing only by checking out specifications. The photograph here will help give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the F300EXR and FZ35.
To sum up, both the cameras come with the identical resolution albeit different sensor sizing. The F300EXR comes with the bigger sensor which will make getting shallow DOF less difficult.
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
FujiFilm F300EXR vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Panasonic |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix F300EXR | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also called as | FinePix F305EXR | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2010-07-21 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | EXR | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.4 x 4.8mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 30.7mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 24-360mm (15.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.5-5.3 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.6 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.20 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 215 gr (0.47 pounds) | 397 gr (0.88 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 104 x 59 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | NP-50 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $280 | $999 |