FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950
Portability
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
95 Imaging
37 Features
22 Overall
31
Portability
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
89 Imaging
35 Features
29 Overall
32
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Key Specs
FujiFilm JX300
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2011
- Alternative Name is FinePix JX305
Kodak Z950
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-350mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 243g - 110 x 67 x 36mm
- Revealed June 2010
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. The image resolution of the JX300 (14MP) and the Z950 (12MP) is relatively comparable and they feature the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe JX300 was unveiled 7 months after the Z950 and they are of a similar generation. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the JX300 matches up versus the Z950 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix JX300 and Kodak EasyShare Z950. The full galleries are provided at FujiFilm JX300 Gallery and Kodak Z950 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX300 over the Kodak Z950
| JX300 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2011 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 7 months |
Reasons to pick Kodak Z950 over the FujiFilm JX300
| Z950 | JX300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Common features in the FujiFilm JX300 and Kodak Z950
| JX300 | Z950 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm JX300 has physical dimensions of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) and the Kodak Z950 has proportions of 110mm x 67mm x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") and a weight of 243 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the JX300 vs the Z950.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the JX300 and Z950 is 95 and 89 respectively.
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be difficult to envision the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The picture here may give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the JX300 and Z950.
To sum up, both of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should count on the FujiFilm JX300 to show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more recent JX300 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
FujiFilm JX300 as a Portrait photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Portrait photography camera
good resolution (14MP)
manual focus not available
lack of manual mode
no external flash support
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
you can focus manually
cannot use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
FujiFilm JX300 Street photography details
Kodak Z950 Street photography details
lighter than competition in class (130g)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
built in image stabilization (Optical)
no moving screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
more heavy than competition in class (243 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
FujiFilm JX300 as a Sports photography camera
Kodak Z950 as a Sports photography camera
good resolution (14MP)
supports tracking focus
max frames per second very slow (1.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (180 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
built in image stabilization (Optical)
maximum shutter speed is a little low (1/1,250s)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Travel photography with FujiFilm JX300
Travel photography with Kodak Z950
lighter than competition in class (130 grams)
good resolution (14MP)
has built in flash
decently wide (28mm)
no Time Lapse function
not so great battery power (180 shots)
display isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
has built in flash
very long reach (350mm)
lack of Timelapse mode
more heavy than competition in class (243g)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
does not offer selfie friendly display
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
FujiFilm JX300 Landscape photography features
Kodak Z950 Landscape photography features
decently wide (28mm)
good resolution (14 megapixels)
manual focus not available
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
small screen (2.7 inches)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
no RAW files
not so great battery power (180 shots)
no Time Lapse function
you can focus manually
pretty good screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
megapixel count low (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
no RAW files
lack of Timelapse mode
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with FujiFilm JX300
Vlogging with Kodak Z950
decently wide (28mm)
lighter than competition in class (130g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.6)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great (1280 x 720 resolution)
no mic support
built in image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not the best (35mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.5)
does not offer selfie friendly display
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
lack of external microphone support
more heavy than competition in class (243 grams)
Photography Glossary
FujiFilm JX300 vs Kodak Z950 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix JX300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix JX300 | Kodak EasyShare Z950 |
| Otherwise known as | FinePix JX305 | - |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2011-01-05 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35-350mm (10.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 6cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 2.7 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1800 seconds | 1/1250 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.00 m | 5.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 130 grams (0.29 lb) | 243 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 110 x 67 x 36mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 180 shots | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | - | KLIC-7003 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $110 | $250 |