FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1
95 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
![FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front FujiFilm FinePix JX350 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350/FujiFilm-JX350-front.jpg)
![Ricoh CX1 front Ricoh CX1 front](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/cameras/gallery/medium/Ricoh-CX1/Ricoh-CX1-front.jpg)
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.6-6.2) lens
- 130g - 94 x 56 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2011
- Other Name is FinePix JX355
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Introduced February 2009
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/LP3_cut_13f_0212-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be reviewing the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap between the resolutions of the JX350 (16MP) and CX1 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Approach-to-AI-Generated-Content-218x150.jpg)
The JX350 was introduced 23 months later than the CX1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the JX350 grades vs the CX1 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/ai-licence-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for FujiFilm FinePix JX350 & Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are viewable at FujiFilm JX350 Gallery & Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm JX350 over the Ricoh CX1
JX350 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2011 | ![]() | February 2009 | Fresher by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the FujiFilm JX350
CX1 | JX350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial exact focus | ||
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh CX1
JX350 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera often, you will have to factor its weight and dimensions. The FujiFilm JX350 comes with physical measurements of 94mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") along with a weight of 130 grams (0.29 lbs) while the Ricoh CX1 has dimensions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the FujiFilm JX350 and Ricoh CX1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.![Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses](https://pxlmag.com/db/assets/camera-size-comparison-animation.gif)
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view size comparison of the JX350 compared to the CX1.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-CX1-size-comparison.jpg)
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the JX350 and CX1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 top view buttons comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-CX1-top-view-buttons-comparison.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by checking technical specs. The visual below will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the JX350 and CX1.
As you can tell, both of these cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can expect the FujiFilm JX350 to resolve extra detail using its extra 7 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop shots a little more aggressively. The younger JX350 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 sensor size comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/sensor-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-CX1-sensor-size-comparison.png)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
![FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison](https://pxlmag.com/db/images/camera-compare/FujiFilm-FinePix-JX350-vs-Ricoh-CX1-screen-back-comparison.jpg)
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/No-Surprise-Pentax-17-Pre-Orders-218x150.jpg)
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/snapchat-218x150.jpg)
Street Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/iphone-optical-stabilization-218x150.jpg)
Sports Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/maxresdefault-218x150.jpg)
Travel Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/tiktok-218x150.jpg)
Landscape Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/samsung-evo-microsd-cards-featur-218x150.jpg)
Vlogging Comparison
![](https://pxlmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/photography-glossary-218x150.jpg)
FujiFilm JX350 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
Model | FujiFilm FinePix JX350 | Ricoh CX1 |
Also called | FinePix JX355 | - |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-01-05 | 2009-02-19 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3440 | 3456 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.6-6.2 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/1800s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 1.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 3.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 130 grams (0.29 pounds) | 180 grams (0.40 pounds) |
Dimensions | 94 x 56 x 24mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 180 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | NP-45A | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD / SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $200 | $299 |