FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
54 Imaging
36 Features
29 Overall
33


70 Imaging
62 Features
38 Overall
52
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 31-436mm (F2.8-5.3) lens
- 865g - 133 x 94 x 145mm
- Launched July 2009
- Alternative Name is FinePix S205EXR
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Launched February 2014

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the S200EXR (12MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the S200EXR (1/1.6") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor dimensions.

The S200EXR was manufactured 5 years prior to the DP2 Quattro which is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S200EXR being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a simple overview of how the S200EXR matches up versus the DP2 Quattro in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The entire galleries are viewable at FujiFilm S200EXR Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S200EXR over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
S200EXR | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the FujiFilm S200EXR
DP2 Quattro | S200EXR | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | February 2014 | ![]() | July 2009 | More modern by 55 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the FujiFilm S200EXR and Sigma DP2 Quattro
S200EXR | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Neither provides Touch display |
FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry around your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S200EXR provides outer measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") and a weight of 865 grams (1.91 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has proportions of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") and a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
See the FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the S200EXR and the DP2 Quattro.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S200EXR and DP2 Quattro is 54 and 70 respectively.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Typically, its difficult to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by looking through technical specs. The pic here should give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S200EXR and DP2 Quattro.
As you have seen, both of the cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The S200EXR featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will result in more detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S200EXR will be behind in sensor innovation.

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

FujiFilm S200EXR vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | FujiFilm | Sigma |
Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S200EXR | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Also referred to as | FinePix S205EXR | - |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-07-22 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | EXR | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/1.6" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 8 x 6mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 31-436mm (14.1x) | 45mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-5.3 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 4.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.20 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 865g (1.91 lb) | 395g (0.87 lb) |
Dimensions | 133 x 94 x 145mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | NP-140 | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC Internal | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $931 |