FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800
75 Imaging
37 Features
34 Overall
35
97 Imaging
39 Features
43 Overall
40
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600 (Push to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-504mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 437g - 110 x 74 x 82mm
- Released February 2010
- Alternative Name is FinePix S2900HD
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 56 x 10mm
- Introduced September 2011
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Overview
Following is a extensive analysis of the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. The resolution of the S2800HD (14MP) and the MV800 (16MP) is relatively similar and they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe S2800HD was brought out 19 months before the MV800 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras offer different body type with the FujiFilm S2800HD being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung MV800 being a Compact camera.
Before delving through a full comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the S2800HD scores vs the MV800 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD & Samsung MV800. The entire galleries are provided at FujiFilm S2800HD Gallery & Samsung MV800 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S2800HD over the Samsung MV800
| S2800HD | MV800 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung MV800 over the FujiFilm S2800HD
| MV800 | S2800HD | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | February 2010 | More modern by 19 months |
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the FujiFilm S2800HD and Samsung MV800
| S2800HD | MV800 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen |
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and size. The FujiFilm S2800HD has got exterior dimensions of 110mm x 74mm x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") and a weight of 437 grams (0.96 lbs) and the Samsung MV800 has specifications of 92mm x 56mm x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") accompanied by a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Check the FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view sizing comparison of the S2800HD and the MV800.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S2800HD and MV800 is 75 and 97 respectively.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the gap between sensor sizes purely by reading a spec sheet. The picture here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S2800HD and MV800.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Samsung MV800 to offer greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The more aged S2800HD is going to be behind in sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
FujiFilm S2800HD vs Samsung MV800 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung MV800 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | FujiFilm FinePix S2800HD | Samsung MV800 |
| Other name | FinePix S2900HD | - |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2010-02-02 | 2011-09-01 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-504mm (18.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.6 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 2cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 99 percent | - |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.40 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320 x 240 (30/15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 437 gr (0.96 lbs) | 121 gr (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 110 x 74 x 82mm (4.3" x 2.9" x 3.2") | 92 x 56 x 10mm (3.6" x 2.2" x 0.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | 4 x AA | BP70 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | Micro SD |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $260 | $499 |
