FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102
67 Imaging
37 Features
37 Overall
37
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Boost to 6400)
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-576mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 540g - 118 x 81 x 100mm
- Launched January 2011
- Additionally Known as FinePix S3250
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F) lens
- 116g - 90 x 59 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
- Additionally referred to as ES55
Photography Glossary FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a substantial gap between the image resolutions of the S3200 (14MP) and SL102 (10MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S3200 was unveiled 2 years after the SL102 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the FujiFilm S3200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Samsung SL102 being a Compact camera.
Before going through a more detailed comparison, below is a short highlight of how the S3200 scores against the SL102 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for FujiFilm FinePix S3200 & Samsung SL102. The full galleries are available at FujiFilm S3200 Gallery & Samsung SL102 Gallery.
Reasons to pick FujiFilm S3200 over the Samsung SL102
| S3200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2011 |  | January 2009 | Newer by 25 months |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL102 over the FujiFilm S3200
| SL102 | S3200 |
|---|
Common features in the FujiFilm S3200 and Samsung SL102
| S3200 | SL102 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Equal display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to travel with your camera, you will need to factor its weight and measurements. The FujiFilm S3200 offers outer measurements of 118mm x 81mm x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") and a weight of 540 grams (1.19 lbs) and the Samsung SL102 has proportions of 90mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view over all size comparison of the S3200 versus the SL102.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the S3200 and SL102 is 67 and 96 respectively.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the contrast between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The pic below might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the S3200 and SL102.
All in all, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can expect to see the FujiFilm S3200 to offer extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop images much more aggressively. The younger S3200 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
FujiFilm S3200 vs Samsung SL102 Specifications
| FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung SL102 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | FujiFilm FinePix S3200 | Samsung SL102 |
| Also Known as | FinePix S3250 | ES55 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2011-01-05 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Highest boosted ISO | 6400 | - |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-576mm (24.0x) | 35-105mm (3.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
| Macro focusing distance | 2cm | 10cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
| Viewfinder coverage | 97% | - |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 1.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.00 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 540 gr (1.19 lbs) | 116 gr (0.26 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 118 x 81 x 100mm (4.6" x 3.2" x 3.9") | 90 x 59 x 22mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 images | - |
| Form of battery | AA | - |
| Battery ID | 4 x AA | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (10sec, 2sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD / SDHC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $190 | $130 |