Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202
93 Imaging
35 Features
24 Overall
30
94 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.6" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-140mm (F3.3-5.1) lens
- 205g - 98 x 59 x 23mm
- Launched April 2009
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is PL50
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Samsung. The image resolution of the Fujifilm F200EXR (12MP) and the SL202 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the Fujifilm F200EXR (1/1.6") and SL202 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor sizes.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm F200EXR was revealed 3 months later than the SL202 and they are both of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a in depth comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the Fujifilm F200EXR matches up versus the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR & Samsung SL202. The full galleries are viewable at Fujifilm F200EXR Gallery & Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm F200EXR over the Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm F200EXR | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Fujifilm F200EXR
| SL202 | Fujifilm F200EXR |
|---|
Common features in the Fujifilm F200EXR and Samsung SL202
| Fujifilm F200EXR | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | April 2009 |  | February 2009 | Similar age |
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm F200EXR offers outer measurements of 98mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has specifications of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check the Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the Fujifilm F200EXR and the SL202.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm F200EXR and SL202 is 93 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is hard to envision the gap between sensor measurements only by looking at technical specs. The graphic underneath might provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm F200EXR and SL202.
As you have seen, each of these cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The Fujifilm F200EXR using its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Fujifilm F200EXR will resolve more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively.
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm F200EXR vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix F200EXR | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called as | - | PL50 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2009-04-30 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/1.6" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 8 x 6mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 48.0mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.3-5.1 | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 4.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1500s | 1/1500s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m (Auto ISO) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Forced Flash, Suppressed Flash, Slow Synchro | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 205 gr (0.45 pounds) | 168 gr (0.37 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 98 x 59 x 23mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | xD Picturecard/SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $350 | $140 |