Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1
95 Imaging
39 Features
30 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Push to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-200mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 135g - 100 x 56 x 24mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Following is a complete review of the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh WG-M1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm JZ200 (16MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is fairly close and both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe Fujifilm JZ200 was released 3 years prior to the WG-M1 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm JZ200 matches up vs the WG-M1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 and Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are viewable at Fujifilm JZ200 Gallery and Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm JZ200 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 115k | Sharper display (+115k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Fujifilm JZ200
| WG-M1 | Fujifilm JZ200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | January 2012 | More modern by 32 months |
Common features in the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh WG-M1
| Fujifilm JZ200 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Absent Touch friendly display |
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry around your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and size. The Fujifilm JZ200 has outer dimensions of 100mm x 56mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 135 grams (0.30 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-M1 has specifications of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Analyze the Fujifilm JZ200 and Ricoh WG-M1 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have at that moment. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm JZ200 against the WG-M1.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm JZ200 and WG-M1 is 95 and 91 respectively.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's hard to imagine the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The picture here may offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm JZ200 and WG-M1.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should anticipate the Fujifilm JZ200 to render extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics more aggressively. The more aged Fujifilm JZ200 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Fujifilm JZ200 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix JZ200 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2012-01-05 | 2014-09-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3216 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | 3200 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-200mm (8.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.9-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 1.5" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 115k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 2.60 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | no built-in flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 135g (0.30 lb) | 190g (0.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 100 x 56 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 350 images |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-45A | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $0 | $2,000 |
