Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F
90 Imaging
32 Features
17 Overall
26
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 260g - 124 x 68 x 26mm
- Revealed July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
In this write-up, we are comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 (10MP) and WB800F (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe Fujifilm Real 3D W1 was introduced 4 years before the WB800F and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short view of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 scores vs the WB800F when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 & Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm Real 3D W1 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W1 over the Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Fujifilm Real 3D W1
| WB800F | Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 | July 2009 | More recent by 42 months | |
| Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.8" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) | |
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and Samsung WB800F
| Fujifilm Real 3D W1 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W1 features exterior measurements of 124mm x 68mm x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") with a weight of 260 grams (0.57 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") having a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 versus the WB800F.

Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WB800F is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is very hard to visualize the gap between sensor measurements purely by checking specs. The photograph underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W1 and WB800F.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You can expect to see the Samsung WB800F to resolve extra detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W1 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W1 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W1 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2009-07-22 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | RP (Real Photo) 3D | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 16 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 260g (0.57 lb) | 218g (0.48 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 68 x 26mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-95 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC card, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $900 | $300 |