Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200
90 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Revealed August 2010
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
Photography Glossary Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Overview
Let's look closer at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Nikon S6200, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Nikon. There exists a big gap between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and S6200 (16MP) but both cameras have the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was unveiled 12 months before the S6200 which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 matches up versus the S6200 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 and Nikon Coolpix S6200. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery and Nikon S6200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Nikon S6200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.8") | |
| Screen resolution | 1150k | 230k | Clearer screen (+920k dot) |
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| S6200 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2011 | August 2010 | Fresher by 12 months | |
| Manual focus | Dial precise focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Nikon S6200
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you'll have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 features physical dimensions of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Nikon S6200 has specifications of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Take a look at the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Nikon S6200 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have at that moment. The following is a front view dimensions comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 against the S6200.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and S6200 is 90 and 94 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be tough to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by going over specs. The graphic here will help provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and S6200.
All in all, both the cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Nikon S6200 to deliver greater detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Real 3D W3 is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Nikon S6200 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Nikon |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Nikon Coolpix S6200 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2010-08-17 | 2011-08-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Expeed C2 |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.2-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 8cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,150k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | - | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 1/4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/1000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 1.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.60 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 160 grams (0.35 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 250 photographs |
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | NP-50 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $900 | $229 |