Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4
90 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
92 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 230g - 124 x 66 x 28mm
- Released August 2010
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Revealed August 2010
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh CX4, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors FujiFilm and Ricoh. The resolution of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 (10MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm Real 3D W3 was brought out about the same time to the CX4 which means that they are of a similar age. Both cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in-depth comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 grades vs the CX4 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 & Ricoh CX4. The entire galleries are provided at Fujifilm Real 3D W3 Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Real 3D W3 over the Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1150k |  | 920k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Fujifilm Real 3D W3
| CX4 | Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh CX4
| Fujifilm Real 3D W3 | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | August 2010 |  | August 2010 | Same age |
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither provides Touch display |
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to factor in its weight and size. The Fujifilm Real 3D W3 provides physical measurements of 124mm x 66mm x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has specifications of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs the CX4.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and CX4 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specifications. The image below should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm Real 3D W3 and CX4.
To sum up, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the same exact megapixels therefore you can expect comparable quality of pictures however you will need to factor the age of the cameras into account.
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm Real 3D W3 vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Ricoh |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Real 3D W3 | Ricoh CX4 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2010-08-17 | 2010-08-19 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | 3D RP(Real Photo) HD | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focusing distance | 8cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3.5" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,150k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 1/4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/1000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.60 m | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 205g (0.45 lb) |
| Dimensions | 124 x 66 x 28mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-50 | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $900 | $211 |
