Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W
90 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
70 Imaging
34 Features
32 Overall
33
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-4.9) lens
- 232g - 116 x 71 x 30mm
- Introduced March 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 3200 (Raise to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 428g - 116 x 83 x 92mm
- Released July 2010
- Other Name is WB5000
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Overview
In this article, we are comparing the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung HZ25W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands FujiFilm and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the Fujifilm XP200 (16MP) and HZ25W (12MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Fujifilm XP200 was announced 2 years after the HZ25W which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise summary of how the Fujifilm XP200 scores versus the HZ25W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Fujifilm FinePix XP200 and Samsung HZ25W. The whole galleries are viewable at Fujifilm XP200 Gallery and Samsung HZ25W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm XP200 over the Samsung HZ25W
| Fujifilm XP200 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2013 | July 2010 | Newer by 33 months | |
| Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ25W over the Fujifilm XP200
| HZ25W | Fujifilm XP200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung HZ25W
| Fujifilm XP200 | HZ25W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
| Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Fujifilm XP200 has got outside measurements of 116mm x 71mm x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung HZ25W has specifications of 116mm x 83mm x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") and a weight of 428 grams (0.94 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm XP200 and Samsung HZ25W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you select at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm XP200 versus the HZ25W.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm XP200 and HZ25W is 90 and 70 respectively.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the difference in sensor dimensions purely by seeing specifications. The pic here may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm XP200 and HZ25W.
To sum up, both of those cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You should expect to see the Fujifilm XP200 to produce more detail with its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more recent Fujifilm XP200 should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Fujifilm XP200 vs Samsung HZ25W Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung HZ25W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | FujiFilm | Samsung |
| Model | Fujifilm FinePix XP200 | Samsung HZ25W |
| Also called | - | WB5000 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2013-03-22 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Highest boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 64 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-4.9 | f/2.8-5.0 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display tech | TFT color LCD monitor | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.10 m | 5.60 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 232 grams (0.51 lb) | 428 grams (0.94 lb) |
| Dimensions | 116 x 71 x 30mm (4.6" x 2.8" x 1.2") | 116 x 83 x 92mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 3.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | NP-50A | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec, delay, Group Timer) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $250 | $350 |