Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370
96 Imaging
33 Features
20 Overall
27
95 Imaging
39 Features
35 Overall
37
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
- 110g - 92 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced July 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F) lens
- 150g - 101 x 58 x 19mm
- Introduced September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Overview
Here is a comprehensive analysis of the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Kodak Easyshare M5370, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies FujiFilm and Kodak. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the Fujifilm Z33WP (10MP) and Easyshare M5370 (16MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe Fujifilm Z33WP was unveiled 3 years before the Easyshare M5370 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a simple summary of how the Fujifilm Z33WP grades against the Easyshare M5370 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP & Kodak Easyshare M5370. The full galleries are available at Fujifilm Z33WP Gallery & Kodak Easyshare M5370 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z33WP over the Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm Z33WP | Easyshare M5370 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Kodak Easyshare M5370 over the Fujifilm Z33WP
| Easyshare M5370 | Fujifilm Z33WP | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2011 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 26 months |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Kodak Easyshare M5370
| Fujifilm Z33WP | Easyshare M5370 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z33WP has got outside dimensions of 92mm x 60mm x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 110 grams (0.24 lbs) and the Kodak Easyshare M5370 has dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs).
Contrast the Fujifilm Z33WP versus Kodak Easyshare M5370 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the Fujifilm Z33WP compared to the Easyshare M5370.
Considering size and weight, the portability grade of the Fujifilm Z33WP and Easyshare M5370 is 96 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to picture the difference between sensor sizing just by reading through specs. The photograph underneath should give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z33WP and Easyshare M5370.
All in all, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can anticipate the Kodak Easyshare M5370 to give you more detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older Fujifilm Z33WP is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Fujifilm Z33WP vs Kodak Easyshare M5370 Specifications
| Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Kodak Easyshare M5370 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | FujiFilm | Kodak |
| Model type | Fujifilm FinePix Z33WP | Kodak Easyshare M5370 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2009-07-01 | 2011-09-14 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 64 | 64 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-4.2 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 8cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 2.7" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 8 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 1.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.90 m | 3.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Slow sync, Red-eye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-1, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 110 grams (0.24 pounds) | 150 grams (0.33 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 92 x 60 x 21mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 19mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | NP-45 | KLIC-7006 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC card, Internal | MicroSD/MicroSDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $197 | $160 |