Clicky

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV

Portability
95
Imaging
33
Features
13
Overall
25
Fujifilm FinePix Z35 front
 
Ricoh GR Digital IV front
Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
47
Overall
39

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Key Specs

Fujifilm Z35
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.7-4.2) lens
  • 125g - 90 x 58 x 24mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Ricoh GR Digital IV
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28mm (F1.9) lens
  • 190g - 109 x 59 x 33mm
  • Introduced September 2011
  • Succeeded the Ricoh GR Digital III
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Overview

On this page, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers FujiFilm and Ricoh. The image resolution of the Fujifilm Z35 (10MP) and the GR Digital IV (10MP) is relatively comparable but the Fujifilm Z35 (1/2.3") and GR Digital IV (1/1.7") boast different sensor size.

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The Fujifilm Z35 was announced 3 years earlier than the GR Digital IV which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).

Before delving right into a in depth comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the Fujifilm Z35 matches up against the GR Digital IV in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Fujifilm Z35 over the Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Fujifilm Z35 GR Digital IV 

Reasons to pick Ricoh GR Digital IV over the Fujifilm Z35

 GR Digital IV Fujifilm Z35 
IntroducedSeptember 2011July 2009More modern by 26 months
Manually focus Very precise focus
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution1230k230kSharper screen (+1000k dot)

Common features in the Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV

 Fujifilm Z35 GR Digital IV 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch screen Missing Touch screen

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Physical Comparison

For anyone who is aiming to carry around your camera often, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Fujifilm Z35 provides outside dimensions of 90mm x 58mm x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Ricoh GR Digital IV has dimensions of 109mm x 59mm x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).

Check the Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the Fujifilm Z35 against the GR Digital IV.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm Z35 and GR Digital IV is 95 and 92 respectively.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV top view buttons comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it can be tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizes just by checking out technical specs. The pic here might give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm Z35 and GR Digital IV.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras have the same MP albeit different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm Z35 features the smaller sensor which should make getting shallow DOF trickier. The more aged Fujifilm Z35 will be behind in sensor technology.

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV sensor size comparison

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and ViewFinder

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Portrait photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Portrait photography features
19
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
cannot use external flash
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
41
you can focus manually
saves RAW formats
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Street photography with Fujifilm Z35
Street photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
54
lighter than others in class (125g)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
65
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Sports photography factors
Ricoh GR Digital IV Sports photography factors
16
max shutter speed is low (1/1,000s)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks phase detect AF
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
great battery (390 CIPA)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10MP)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
has no phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Fujifilm Z35
Travel photography with Ricoh GR Digital IV
56
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
has built in flash
does not have Timelapse recording
resolution not great (10MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
67
great battery (390 CIPA)
built-in flash
very good max aperture (f1.9)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Fujifilm Z35 Landscape photography features
Ricoh GR Digital IV Landscape photography features
22
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
small screen (2.5 inch)
lack of manual mode
lack of image stabilization
resolution not great (10 megapixels)
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW format
does not have Timelapse recording
53
you can focus manually
very good max aperture (f1.9)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
saves RAW formats
great battery (390 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (28mm)
MP count low (10 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/1.7")
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Fujifilm Z35
Vlogging with Ricoh GR Digital IV
25
lighter than others in class (125 grams)
wide angle not great (35mm)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.7)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (640 x 480 resolution)
does not have external microphone socket
29
very good max aperture (f1.9)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
display is not selfie friendly
low quality video (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone port
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm Z35 vs Ricoh GR Digital IV Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm Z35 and Ricoh GR Digital IV
 Fujifilm FinePix Z35Ricoh GR Digital IV
General Information
Company FujiFilm Ricoh
Model type Fujifilm FinePix Z35 Ricoh GR Digital IV
Category Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Compact
Introduced 2009-07-22 2011-09-15
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 10MP 10MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 3:2 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3648 x 2736 3648 x 2736
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch to focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) 28mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.7-4.2 f/1.9
Macro focusing range 8cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dot 1,230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (optional)
Features
Slowest shutter speed 3 secs 1 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/1000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 3.10 m 3.00 m
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps)
Maximum video resolution 640x480 640x480
Video format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 190g (0.42 lb)
Physical dimensions 90 x 58 x 24mm (3.5" x 2.3" x 0.9") 109 x 59 x 33mm (4.3" x 2.3" x 1.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 390 images
Battery form - Battery Pack
Battery ID NP-45A DB65
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC card, Internal SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots One One
Retail cost $130 $599