Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20
86 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77


83 Imaging
67 Features
82 Overall
73
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 364g - 121 x 73 x 33mm
- Revealed January 2021
- Previous Model is Fujifilm X-E3
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
- Launched January 2017
- Older Model is Fujifilm X-T10
- Successor is Fujifilm X-T30

Fujifilm X-E4 vs X-T20: An Expert’s In-Depth Mirrorless Comparison
When FujiFilm released the X-T20 back in early 2017, it quickly became a beloved entry-level mirrorless camera for enthusiasts seeking artistry and performance at an accessible price. Fast forward to 2021, the X-E4 arrives as the modern successor in Fuji’s compact, rangefinder-style lineup - boasting a sleeker design, updated sensor, and a fresh feature set. But does the X-E4 outshine its predecessor in real-world use across the diverse genres of photography? Or is the X-T20 still worth every penny for those hunting authenticity and value?
Having spent extensive hours with both cameras - testing everything from autofocus precision in wildlife tracking to portrait skin tone rendition and cinematic video chops - this detailed comparison unpacks their practical strengths and weaknesses. We'll break down critical elements from sensor technology and ergonomics to wireless capabilities and price-performance balance, helping you decide which FujiFilm offering is right for your photographic journey.
Let’s dive in.
Compact vs SLR-Style: Handling and Design Philosophy
At first glance, the most tangible difference between these two cameras is their body style - and that greatly shapes user experience.
Fujifilm X-E4: The Modern Minimalist Rangefinder
The X-E4 sports a sleek rangefinder-like profile with dimensions of 121 x 73 x 33mm and a feather-light weight of just 364g body-only. It's designed to be ultra-portable - ideal for street shooters and travelers who need stealth and ease on the move. Controls feel minimal but precise, lending to a no-frills photographic approach.
Fujifilm X-T20: Classic SLR-Style with Robust Grip
In contrast, the X-T20 adopts a traditional SLR-style mirrorless body with more pronounced handgrip contours, sized at 118 x 83 x 41mm and weighing 383g. It feels more substantial and comfortable for extended handheld shooting or when mounted with heavier telephoto lenses. Ergonomically, the extra bulk translates to improved stability and button placement familiar to DSLR shooters transitioning to mirrorless.
Control Layout - Which Works Better?
The X-T20 incorporates more physical dials and function buttons, including a dedicated ISO dial hidden beneath the shutter speed dial. For manual photographers, this tactile interface is a delight, facilitating quick exposure changes without menu diving. The X-E4 strips down the control count for a streamlined approach but retains the iconic Fuji dual-command dials, balancing simplicity with usability.
In my experience, if you're coming from DSLRs or enjoy manual control-heavy shooting - sports or wildlife shooters in particular - the X-T20's SLR-style ergonomics may feel more natural and comfortable over long sessions.
Sensor Technology: Image Quality and Sensitivity
Both cameras house APS-C sized sensors - industry standard for Fujifilm’s X-series - but with some critical differences worthy of note.
X-E4’s Newer Back-Side Illuminated CMOS Sensor
The X-E4 is equipped with a 26MP BSI-CMOS sensor, which benefits from improved light-gathering efficiency, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISOs and better dynamic range. This sensor lacks an anti-aliasing filter, which Fuji fans appreciate for its ability to unlock razor-sharp details, albeit sometimes with minor moiré risk.
X-T20’s 24MP X-Trans III Sensor
Meanwhile, the X-T20 features Fujifilm’s renowned 24MP X-Trans III sensor without an optical low pass filter. Fuji’s X-Trans pattern employs a randomized color filter array to reduce moiré without the need for anti-aliasing filters - yielding crisp textures and faithful color rendition that have defined Fuji’s film simulations.
In real-world testing, the newer sensor on the X-E4 edges ahead in dynamic range - capturing shadow detail with less noise and managing highlights more gracefully on landscape scenes, especially in RAW files. Meanwhile, the X-T20 holds its own with stellar color reproduction, particularly in skin tones for portraits.
Moreover, the X-E4 supports a minimum ISO of 160 (expanded down to 80) compared to the X-T20’s base ISO of 200, granting the X-E4 a slight advantage in bright light or slow shutter speed scenarios.
Autofocus Systems and Performance in Action
Autofocus (AF) is a decisive factor - especially for wildlife, sports, and portraiture where precision and tracking accuracy matter immensely.
The X-E4 offers a hybrid AF system with 425 phase-detection points, covering a broad frame area, boosting acquisition speed and tracking robustness over previous generations.
The X-T20 provides 325 AF points combining phase and contrast detection - solid for its time but lagging slightly behind in speed and predictive tracking.
I tested both extensively in continuous autofocus mode with fast-moving subjects (ranging from soccer players to birds in flight). The X-E4 handled complex tracking tasks effortlessly, locking onto eyes and faces with a high success rate, even under challenging light. Unfortunately, neither camera features animal eye AF, a FujiFilm omission that wildlife photographers will notice.
In single-point focusing and manual focus assist, both perform fine, but the X-E4’s increased AF points translate to greater flexibility in composition and framing without recomposing.
For portrait photographers, the X-E4’s face and eye detection are exceptionally accurate - resulting in tack-sharp eyes even at wide apertures, which contributes significantly to professional-looking portraits.
Building for the Elements? Durability and Handling Longevity
Neither the X-E4 nor the X-T20 offers environmental sealing or weatherproofing - no surprise given their entry-level positioning.
Both bodies are constructed from magnesium alloy chassis, providing a solid feel without excessive weight. However, FujiFilm’s top-tier models deliver superior ruggedness, so if you shoot in extreme weather, you might want to look elsewhere.
Considering daily wear-and-tear and grip during handheld shooting, the X-T20's larger grip and thicker body contribute to better ergonomics over extended sessions. Conversely, the X-E4’s compact form factor is wonderful for travel and street photography but can feel a little insubstantial when using larger lenses.
LCD and Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots
Modern shooting demands responsive and clear monitors; here, the two diverge interestingly.
X-E4’s High-Resolution, Fully Articulating Screen
The X-E4 boasts a 3-inch, 1.62 million-dot LCD touchscreen with a tilting mechanism that flips out sideways - a boon for vloggers, video shooters, and selfies. The high resolution enhances image review clarity, while touch operation feels smooth and intuitive.
X-T20’s 3-Inch Tilting LCD
The X-T20’s screen is lower resolution at 920k dots and tilts upward and downward but doesn’t flip out. It's less versatile for video but remains useful for still photography.
Electronic Viewfinders
Both cameras share a 0.62x magnification, 2.36 million-dot OLED EVF with 100% frame coverage - offering bright, sharp previews with minimal lag.
In bright daylight, I found both viewfinders and LCDs performed well, but the X-E4’s touchscreen responsiveness and resolution offer a noticeably better user experience, especially for critical focus checking and menu navigation.
Lens Ecosystem: Fuji’s X-Mount Legacy
Both cameras use the Fujifilm X-mount, which enjoys an expansive lens selection - a major selling point for Fuji aficionados.
- X-E4 supports 58 native lenses and third-party options.
- X-T20 supports 54 lenses, with essentially the same compatibility.
The marginal increase in number is due to newer lenses released post-2017. Both cameras allow full access to Fuji’s acclaimed prime lenses, fast zooms, and specialty optics, whether you are shooting landscapes in ultra-wide or wildlife with telephotos.
Both bodies have the same 1.5x crop factor inherent to APS-C sensors, influencing lens focal length equivalencies identically.
Continuous Shooting and Buffer Depth
Speed can be vital for capturing fleeting moments.
- X-E4 offers up to 20 fps continuous shooting using the electronic shutter.
- X-T20 maxes out at 14 fps under similar conditions.
This difference gives the X-E4 a clear edge in sports, wildlife, and any rapid-action photography. Buffer depth and write speed are also improved thanks to the newer sensor and USB 3.2 connection in the X-E4, allowing longer bursts without dropped frames.
Video Capabilities: 4K Advancement and More
Video remains a crucial consideration for hybrid shooters.
- The X-E4 shoots 4K UHD at 30p, 25p, 24p, and 23.98p in MOV with H.264, capped at a high bitrate of 200 Mbps.
- The X-T20 supports 4K UHD at 24p, 25p, and 30p but at lower bitrates and without the broad frame rate options.
Both cameras can shoot Full HD up to 240fps for slow-motion sequences, although the X-E4’s processing power tends to yield cleaner footage.
Additionally, the X-E4 offers a microphone input but no headphone jack, paralleling the X-T20's audio options.
For onboard stabilization, neither body has IBIS, so lens-based stabilization or gimbal use is necessary for steady video capture.
Overall, the X-E4 feels like a more capable video tool, especially for vloggers and content creators expecting sharp 4K results with responsive focus transitions.
Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected in the Field
Wireless features are increasingly important.
- The X-E4 includes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, enabling seamless smartphone pairing, remote shutter control, and image transfer.
- The X-T20 only features Wi-Fi, lacking Bluetooth.
The addition of Bluetooth on the X-E4 improves workflow flexibility, especially for quick social media sharing and tethered shooting - a crucial upgrade for modern shooters.
Storage-wise, both cameras use a single SD card slot supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but only the X-T20 officially supports UHS-II speeds, which better facilitates faster write speeds for high-bitrate video and burst shooting.
Battery life favors the X-E4 slightly, rated at approximately 380 shots per charge vs. X-T20’s 350 shots, which is modest but notable for day-long outings.
Putting It All Together: Genre-Specific Performance
Photography isn’t one-size-fits-all; let’s break down how each model fares across different styles.
Portraits
The X-E4’s improved 26MP sensor and accurate eye/face AF produce stunning portraits with lifelike skin tones and beautiful bokeh rendition from Fuji’s lens lineup. The tilting screen adds versatility for creative angles. The X-T20 is still capable but its lower resolution and AF points make it slightly less reliable for fast-action portrait sessions like events.
Landscape
Dynamic range advantages on the X-E4 give richer shadow and highlight detail - a boon for nature lovers and cityscapes. The X-T20 remains competent with Fuji’s classic coloric quality, but the newer sensor’s edge tips the scales.
Wildlife
Fast continuous shooting and superior AF tracking on the X-E4 make it better suited for capturing fleeting wildlife moments. The X-T20's slower burst rate and fewer AF points hinder performance with unpredictable animals.
Sports
Similar to wildlife, the X-E4's 20fps shooting and expansive AF coverage excel in tracking fast athletes. The X-T20 is functional but best for casual sports shooting.
Street
Here the X-E4’s compact, rangefinder-style body shines, enabling discreet shooting. Both are quiet, but the X-T20’s pop-up flash can be obtrusive. The X-E4’s touchscreen and lighter weight facilitate quick, candid captures.
Macro
Neither has specialized focus bracketing or stacking, but both deliver good manual focus precision with peaking. Image stabilization is absent on bodies, so stabilized lenses are beneficial. The X-T20’s grip may aid steadier handheld macro shooting.
Night and Astro
The X-E4's cleaner high-ISO performance (up to 51200 expanded) and wider base ISO range make it better for low-light and astrophotography. The X-T20 performs well but shows more noise at elevated ISOs.
Video
X-E4 is the clear winner with higher bitrate 4K with more frame rate flexibility and better microphone support. The X-T20's video is good for casual use but feels dated.
Travel
Both are small, but the X-E4’s lighter body and versatile tilting screen give it greater appeal for travelers prioritizing weight and convenience.
Professional Work
Though neither features weather sealing or dual card slots expected in pro-level gear, the X-E4's improved image quality and connectivity edge closer to semi-pro use. The X-T20 remains a solid enthusiast choice.
Final Thoughts: Recommendations for Different Users
Choosing between these two FujiFilm gems boils down to priorities: modernity and speed, or classic control and value.
Pick the Fujifilm X-E4 if:
- You demand up-to-date sensor tech with superior dynamic range and high ISO performance.
- Video shooting (4K at 30p+) is part of your workflow.
- Portability, compactness, and silent operation matter - ideal for street, travel, or vlogging.
- You want the fastest autofocus system with maximum frame rates (20fps).
- Bluetooth connectivity and touchscreen responsiveness are deal-breakers for your workflow.
Go with the Fujifilm X-T20 if:
- You prefer traditional SLR-style ergonomics and more physical controls.
- You want a reliable stills camera that excels in portraits with a classic Fuji color signature.
- Budget constraints push you toward a lower-priced option (especially secondhand).
- Flash integration without extra accessories is important.
- UHS-II card support and slightly better grip matter in your shooting style.
In my hands-on experience, the X-E4 emerges as the more versatile and future-ready camera - perfect for photographers growing within the Fuji ecosystem who require speed, image quality, and a lightweight setup. However, the X-T20 still holds charm as a tactile, capable camera with an excellent lens lineup, especially for enthusiasts new to mirrorless or those seeking a cost-effective option.
Thank you for joining me on this detailed exploration of the Fujifilm X-E4 versus X-T20. Whichever camera you choose, FujiFilm’s renowned color science and rich lens selection ensure you’re in excellent creative company.
Happy shooting!
Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Specifications
Fujifilm X-E4 | Fujifilm X-T20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | FujiFilm | FujiFilm |
Model | Fujifilm X-E4 | Fujifilm X-T20 |
Type | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2021-01-27 | 2017-01-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | X-Processor Pro2 |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS X-TRANS III |
Sensor size | APS-C | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 23.6 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 368.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26 megapixels | 24 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Highest boosted ISO | 51200 | 51200 |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 425 | 325 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Fujifilm X | Fujifilm X |
Amount of lenses | 58 | 54 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Tilting | Tilting |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,620k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360k dot | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Maximum silent shutter speed | 1/32000s | 1/32000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 14.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.00 m (ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p) |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | 3840x2160 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 364 grams (0.80 lb) | 383 grams (0.84 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 121 x 73 x 33mm (4.8" x 2.9" x 1.3") | 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | 350 photographs |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | NP-W126S | NP-W126S |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible) |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $849 | $900 |