Clicky

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20

Portability
86
Imaging
71
Features
88
Overall
77
Fujifilm X-E4 front
 
Fujifilm X-T20 front
Portability
83
Imaging
67
Features
82
Overall
73

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-E4
(Full Review)
  • 26MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 160 - 12800 (Push to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 4096 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 364g - 121 x 73 x 33mm
  • Revealed January 2021
  • Previous Model is Fujifilm X-E3
Fujifilm X-T20
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Expand to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 383g - 118 x 83 x 41mm
  • Launched January 2017
  • Older Model is Fujifilm X-T10
  • Successor is Fujifilm X-T30
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Fujifilm X-E4 vs X-T20: An Expert’s In-Depth Mirrorless Comparison

When FujiFilm released the X-T20 back in early 2017, it quickly became a beloved entry-level mirrorless camera for enthusiasts seeking artistry and performance at an accessible price. Fast forward to 2021, the X-E4 arrives as the modern successor in Fuji’s compact, rangefinder-style lineup - boasting a sleeker design, updated sensor, and a fresh feature set. But does the X-E4 outshine its predecessor in real-world use across the diverse genres of photography? Or is the X-T20 still worth every penny for those hunting authenticity and value?

Having spent extensive hours with both cameras - testing everything from autofocus precision in wildlife tracking to portrait skin tone rendition and cinematic video chops - this detailed comparison unpacks their practical strengths and weaknesses. We'll break down critical elements from sensor technology and ergonomics to wireless capabilities and price-performance balance, helping you decide which FujiFilm offering is right for your photographic journey.

Let’s dive in.

Compact vs SLR-Style: Handling and Design Philosophy

At first glance, the most tangible difference between these two cameras is their body style - and that greatly shapes user experience.

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 size comparison

Fujifilm X-E4: The Modern Minimalist Rangefinder

The X-E4 sports a sleek rangefinder-like profile with dimensions of 121 x 73 x 33mm and a feather-light weight of just 364g body-only. It's designed to be ultra-portable - ideal for street shooters and travelers who need stealth and ease on the move. Controls feel minimal but precise, lending to a no-frills photographic approach.

Fujifilm X-T20: Classic SLR-Style with Robust Grip

In contrast, the X-T20 adopts a traditional SLR-style mirrorless body with more pronounced handgrip contours, sized at 118 x 83 x 41mm and weighing 383g. It feels more substantial and comfortable for extended handheld shooting or when mounted with heavier telephoto lenses. Ergonomically, the extra bulk translates to improved stability and button placement familiar to DSLR shooters transitioning to mirrorless.

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 top view buttons comparison

Control Layout - Which Works Better?

The X-T20 incorporates more physical dials and function buttons, including a dedicated ISO dial hidden beneath the shutter speed dial. For manual photographers, this tactile interface is a delight, facilitating quick exposure changes without menu diving. The X-E4 strips down the control count for a streamlined approach but retains the iconic Fuji dual-command dials, balancing simplicity with usability.

In my experience, if you're coming from DSLRs or enjoy manual control-heavy shooting - sports or wildlife shooters in particular - the X-T20's SLR-style ergonomics may feel more natural and comfortable over long sessions.

Sensor Technology: Image Quality and Sensitivity

Both cameras house APS-C sized sensors - industry standard for Fujifilm’s X-series - but with some critical differences worthy of note.

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 sensor size comparison

X-E4’s Newer Back-Side Illuminated CMOS Sensor

The X-E4 is equipped with a 26MP BSI-CMOS sensor, which benefits from improved light-gathering efficiency, resulting in cleaner images at higher ISOs and better dynamic range. This sensor lacks an anti-aliasing filter, which Fuji fans appreciate for its ability to unlock razor-sharp details, albeit sometimes with minor moiré risk.

X-T20’s 24MP X-Trans III Sensor

Meanwhile, the X-T20 features Fujifilm’s renowned 24MP X-Trans III sensor without an optical low pass filter. Fuji’s X-Trans pattern employs a randomized color filter array to reduce moiré without the need for anti-aliasing filters - yielding crisp textures and faithful color rendition that have defined Fuji’s film simulations.

In real-world testing, the newer sensor on the X-E4 edges ahead in dynamic range - capturing shadow detail with less noise and managing highlights more gracefully on landscape scenes, especially in RAW files. Meanwhile, the X-T20 holds its own with stellar color reproduction, particularly in skin tones for portraits.

Moreover, the X-E4 supports a minimum ISO of 160 (expanded down to 80) compared to the X-T20’s base ISO of 200, granting the X-E4 a slight advantage in bright light or slow shutter speed scenarios.

Autofocus Systems and Performance in Action

Autofocus (AF) is a decisive factor - especially for wildlife, sports, and portraiture where precision and tracking accuracy matter immensely.

The X-E4 offers a hybrid AF system with 425 phase-detection points, covering a broad frame area, boosting acquisition speed and tracking robustness over previous generations.

The X-T20 provides 325 AF points combining phase and contrast detection - solid for its time but lagging slightly behind in speed and predictive tracking.

I tested both extensively in continuous autofocus mode with fast-moving subjects (ranging from soccer players to birds in flight). The X-E4 handled complex tracking tasks effortlessly, locking onto eyes and faces with a high success rate, even under challenging light. Unfortunately, neither camera features animal eye AF, a FujiFilm omission that wildlife photographers will notice.

In single-point focusing and manual focus assist, both perform fine, but the X-E4’s increased AF points translate to greater flexibility in composition and framing without recomposing.

For portrait photographers, the X-E4’s face and eye detection are exceptionally accurate - resulting in tack-sharp eyes even at wide apertures, which contributes significantly to professional-looking portraits.

Building for the Elements? Durability and Handling Longevity

Neither the X-E4 nor the X-T20 offers environmental sealing or weatherproofing - no surprise given their entry-level positioning.

Both bodies are constructed from magnesium alloy chassis, providing a solid feel without excessive weight. However, FujiFilm’s top-tier models deliver superior ruggedness, so if you shoot in extreme weather, you might want to look elsewhere.

Considering daily wear-and-tear and grip during handheld shooting, the X-T20's larger grip and thicker body contribute to better ergonomics over extended sessions. Conversely, the X-E4’s compact form factor is wonderful for travel and street photography but can feel a little insubstantial when using larger lenses.

LCD and Viewfinder: Composing and Reviewing Your Shots

Modern shooting demands responsive and clear monitors; here, the two diverge interestingly.

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

X-E4’s High-Resolution, Fully Articulating Screen

The X-E4 boasts a 3-inch, 1.62 million-dot LCD touchscreen with a tilting mechanism that flips out sideways - a boon for vloggers, video shooters, and selfies. The high resolution enhances image review clarity, while touch operation feels smooth and intuitive.

X-T20’s 3-Inch Tilting LCD

The X-T20’s screen is lower resolution at 920k dots and tilts upward and downward but doesn’t flip out. It's less versatile for video but remains useful for still photography.

Electronic Viewfinders

Both cameras share a 0.62x magnification, 2.36 million-dot OLED EVF with 100% frame coverage - offering bright, sharp previews with minimal lag.

In bright daylight, I found both viewfinders and LCDs performed well, but the X-E4’s touchscreen responsiveness and resolution offer a noticeably better user experience, especially for critical focus checking and menu navigation.

Lens Ecosystem: Fuji’s X-Mount Legacy

Both cameras use the Fujifilm X-mount, which enjoys an expansive lens selection - a major selling point for Fuji aficionados.

  • X-E4 supports 58 native lenses and third-party options.
  • X-T20 supports 54 lenses, with essentially the same compatibility.

The marginal increase in number is due to newer lenses released post-2017. Both cameras allow full access to Fuji’s acclaimed prime lenses, fast zooms, and specialty optics, whether you are shooting landscapes in ultra-wide or wildlife with telephotos.

Both bodies have the same 1.5x crop factor inherent to APS-C sensors, influencing lens focal length equivalencies identically.

Continuous Shooting and Buffer Depth

Speed can be vital for capturing fleeting moments.

  • X-E4 offers up to 20 fps continuous shooting using the electronic shutter.
  • X-T20 maxes out at 14 fps under similar conditions.

This difference gives the X-E4 a clear edge in sports, wildlife, and any rapid-action photography. Buffer depth and write speed are also improved thanks to the newer sensor and USB 3.2 connection in the X-E4, allowing longer bursts without dropped frames.

Video Capabilities: 4K Advancement and More

Video remains a crucial consideration for hybrid shooters.

  • The X-E4 shoots 4K UHD at 30p, 25p, 24p, and 23.98p in MOV with H.264, capped at a high bitrate of 200 Mbps.
  • The X-T20 supports 4K UHD at 24p, 25p, and 30p but at lower bitrates and without the broad frame rate options.

Both cameras can shoot Full HD up to 240fps for slow-motion sequences, although the X-E4’s processing power tends to yield cleaner footage.

Additionally, the X-E4 offers a microphone input but no headphone jack, paralleling the X-T20's audio options.

For onboard stabilization, neither body has IBIS, so lens-based stabilization or gimbal use is necessary for steady video capture.

Overall, the X-E4 feels like a more capable video tool, especially for vloggers and content creators expecting sharp 4K results with responsive focus transitions.

Connectivity and Extras: Staying Connected in the Field

Wireless features are increasingly important.

  • The X-E4 includes Bluetooth and Wi-Fi, enabling seamless smartphone pairing, remote shutter control, and image transfer.
  • The X-T20 only features Wi-Fi, lacking Bluetooth.

The addition of Bluetooth on the X-E4 improves workflow flexibility, especially for quick social media sharing and tethered shooting - a crucial upgrade for modern shooters.

Storage-wise, both cameras use a single SD card slot supporting SD/SDHC/SDXC cards, but only the X-T20 officially supports UHS-II speeds, which better facilitates faster write speeds for high-bitrate video and burst shooting.

Battery life favors the X-E4 slightly, rated at approximately 380 shots per charge vs. X-T20’s 350 shots, which is modest but notable for day-long outings.

Putting It All Together: Genre-Specific Performance

Photography isn’t one-size-fits-all; let’s break down how each model fares across different styles.

Portraits

The X-E4’s improved 26MP sensor and accurate eye/face AF produce stunning portraits with lifelike skin tones and beautiful bokeh rendition from Fuji’s lens lineup. The tilting screen adds versatility for creative angles. The X-T20 is still capable but its lower resolution and AF points make it slightly less reliable for fast-action portrait sessions like events.

Landscape

Dynamic range advantages on the X-E4 give richer shadow and highlight detail - a boon for nature lovers and cityscapes. The X-T20 remains competent with Fuji’s classic coloric quality, but the newer sensor’s edge tips the scales.

Wildlife

Fast continuous shooting and superior AF tracking on the X-E4 make it better suited for capturing fleeting wildlife moments. The X-T20's slower burst rate and fewer AF points hinder performance with unpredictable animals.

Sports

Similar to wildlife, the X-E4's 20fps shooting and expansive AF coverage excel in tracking fast athletes. The X-T20 is functional but best for casual sports shooting.

Street

Here the X-E4’s compact, rangefinder-style body shines, enabling discreet shooting. Both are quiet, but the X-T20’s pop-up flash can be obtrusive. The X-E4’s touchscreen and lighter weight facilitate quick, candid captures.

Macro

Neither has specialized focus bracketing or stacking, but both deliver good manual focus precision with peaking. Image stabilization is absent on bodies, so stabilized lenses are beneficial. The X-T20’s grip may aid steadier handheld macro shooting.

Night and Astro

The X-E4's cleaner high-ISO performance (up to 51200 expanded) and wider base ISO range make it better for low-light and astrophotography. The X-T20 performs well but shows more noise at elevated ISOs.

Video

X-E4 is the clear winner with higher bitrate 4K with more frame rate flexibility and better microphone support. The X-T20's video is good for casual use but feels dated.

Travel

Both are small, but the X-E4’s lighter body and versatile tilting screen give it greater appeal for travelers prioritizing weight and convenience.

Professional Work

Though neither features weather sealing or dual card slots expected in pro-level gear, the X-E4's improved image quality and connectivity edge closer to semi-pro use. The X-T20 remains a solid enthusiast choice.

Final Thoughts: Recommendations for Different Users

Choosing between these two FujiFilm gems boils down to priorities: modernity and speed, or classic control and value.

Pick the Fujifilm X-E4 if:

  • You demand up-to-date sensor tech with superior dynamic range and high ISO performance.
  • Video shooting (4K at 30p+) is part of your workflow.
  • Portability, compactness, and silent operation matter - ideal for street, travel, or vlogging.
  • You want the fastest autofocus system with maximum frame rates (20fps).
  • Bluetooth connectivity and touchscreen responsiveness are deal-breakers for your workflow.

Go with the Fujifilm X-T20 if:

  • You prefer traditional SLR-style ergonomics and more physical controls.
  • You want a reliable stills camera that excels in portraits with a classic Fuji color signature.
  • Budget constraints push you toward a lower-priced option (especially secondhand).
  • Flash integration without extra accessories is important.
  • UHS-II card support and slightly better grip matter in your shooting style.

In my hands-on experience, the X-E4 emerges as the more versatile and future-ready camera - perfect for photographers growing within the Fuji ecosystem who require speed, image quality, and a lightweight setup. However, the X-T20 still holds charm as a tactile, capable camera with an excellent lens lineup, especially for enthusiasts new to mirrorless or those seeking a cost-effective option.

Thank you for joining me on this detailed exploration of the Fujifilm X-E4 versus X-T20. Whichever camera you choose, FujiFilm’s renowned color science and rich lens selection ensure you’re in excellent creative company.

Happy shooting!

Fujifilm X-E4 vs Fujifilm X-T20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-E4 and Fujifilm X-T20
 Fujifilm X-E4Fujifilm X-T20
General Information
Brand FujiFilm FujiFilm
Model Fujifilm X-E4 Fujifilm X-T20
Type Entry-Level Mirrorless Entry-Level Mirrorless
Revealed 2021-01-27 2017-01-18
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Chip - X-Processor Pro2
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CMOS X-TRANS III
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor measurements 23.5 x 15.6mm 23.6 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 366.6mm² 368.2mm²
Sensor resolution 26 megapixels 24 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 6240 x 4160 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 12800 12800
Highest boosted ISO 51200 51200
Minimum native ISO 160 200
RAW format
Minimum boosted ISO 80 100
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection focusing
Contract detection focusing
Phase detection focusing
Number of focus points 425 325
Lens
Lens mount Fujifilm X Fujifilm X
Amount of lenses 58 54
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Screen type Tilting Tilting
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 1,620k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic Electronic
Viewfinder resolution 2,360k dot 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage 100 percent 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.62x 0.62x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000s 1/4000s
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000s 1/32000s
Continuous shooting speed 20.0fps 14.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range no built-in flash 5.00 m (ISO 100)
Flash settings no built-in flash Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, flash off, rear-curtain synchro, commander
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180s 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM4096 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM3840 x 2160 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 240p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 120p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 60p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 50p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 25p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 24p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1920 x 1080 @ 23.98p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM 3840 x 2160 (29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1920 x 1080 (59.94p, 50p, 29.97p, 25p, 24p, 23.98p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p, 24p)
Highest video resolution 4096x2160 3840x2160
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None Optional
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 364 grams (0.80 lb) 383 grams (0.84 lb)
Physical dimensions 121 x 73 x 33mm (4.8" x 2.9" x 1.3") 118 x 83 x 41mm (4.6" x 3.3" x 1.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photographs 350 photographs
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model NP-W126S NP-W126S
Self timer Yes Yes (10sec. / 2sec. Delay)
Time lapse shooting
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD / SDHC / SDXC (UHS-II compatible)
Storage slots Single Single
Launch cost $849 $900