Clicky

Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381

Portability
74 Imaging
67 Features
75 Overall
70
Fujifilm X-Pro2 front
 
Kodak EasyShare M381 front
Portability
95 Imaging
35 Features
13 Overall
26

Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Key Specs

Fujifilm X-Pro2
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
  • No Anti-Alias Filter
  • 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • Fujifilm X Mount
  • 495g - 141 x 83 x 56mm
  • Revealed January 2016
  • Replaced the Fujifilm X-Pro1
  • Later Model is Fujifilm X-Pro3
Kodak M381
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 64 - 1600
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-175mm (F3.0-4.8) lens
  • 153g - 101 x 60 x 20mm
  • Introduced July 2009
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Overview

Below, we will be evaluating the Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Kodak M381, former is a Advanced Mirrorless while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands FujiFilm and Kodak. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the Fujifilm X-Pro2 (24MP) and M381 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-Pro2 (APS-C) and M381 (1/2.3") possess totally different sensor dimensions.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

The Fujifilm X-Pro2 was released 6 years after the M381 which is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-Pro2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Kodak M381 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the Fujifilm X-Pro2 matches up versus the M381 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone 
	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-Pro2 over the Kodak M381

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-Pro2 M381 
IntroducedJanuary 2016July 2009Newer by 79 months
Manually focus  Very precise focusing
Screen resolution1620k230kClearer screen (+1390k dot)
		

	

	
	

		

		
Reasons to pick Kodak M381 over the Fujifilm X-Pro2

		

		

			
 M381 Fujifilm X-Pro2 
		

	

	
	

		

		
Common features in the Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Kodak M381

		

		

			
 Fujifilm X-Pro2 M381 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen sizing
Selfie screen  Neither features selfie screen
Touch screen  Lacking Touch screen
		

	

	

	
	
	
	

	

		

		
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Physical Comparison

		

		

			
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera regularly, you should factor in its weight and measurements. The Fujifilm X-Pro2 enjoys physical measurements of 141mm x 83mm x 56mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 2.2") accompanied by a weight of 495 grams (1.09 lbs) while the Kodak M381 has proportions of 101mm x 60mm x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 153 grams (0.34 lbs).
Examine the Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Kodak M381 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the Fujifilm X-Pro2 versus the M381.
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 size comparison
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-Pro2 and M381 is 74 and 95 respectively.
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 top view buttons comparison		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Sensor Comparison

		

		

			
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by researching specifications. The picture here may provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the Fujifilm X-Pro2 and M381.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The Fujifilm X-Pro2 due to its bigger sensor will make getting bokeh less difficult and the Fujifilm X-Pro2 will result in greater detail as a result of its extra 12 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs much more aggressively. The younger Fujifilm X-Pro2 will have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
	
			Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 sensor size comparison			
		

	

	
	

		

		
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Screen and ViewFinder

		

		

					

		Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Screen and Viewfinder comparison	

	
			Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video	

	
	
	
	

	

		
Photography Type Scores

		

	

	
Portrait Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro2 Portrait photography highlights
Kodak M381 Portrait photography highlights
80
 has manual focus
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 includes face detection focusing
 saves RAW formats
21
 focusing manually not possible
 no manual exposure
 can't use external flash
 MP count low (12 megapixels)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing
Street Comparison
 Fujifilm X-Pro2 as a Street photography camera
 Kodak M381 as a Street photography camera
67
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 saves RAW formats
 environment sealing
 fixed screen
 does not have image stabilization
47
 no moving screen
 lack of image stabilization
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 heavier than average in class (153g)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Sports Comparison
 Fujifilm X-Pro2 as a Sports photography camera
 Kodak M381 as a Sports photography camera
72
 max shutter speed is good (1/8,000 seconds)
 silent shutter (1/32,000 seconds)
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 includes tracking autofocus
 environment sealing
 sensor has phase detect AF
 does not have image stabilization
 terrible battery (350 shots)
17
 low max shutter speed (1/1,400 seconds)
 no shutter priority
 lack of image stabilization
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of phase detect AF
Photography Glossary
Travel Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro2 Travel photography info
Kodak M381 Travel photography info
63
 environment sealing
 sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
 terrible battery (350 CIPA)
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
50
 built-in flash
 missing Time Lapse mode
 heavier than average in class (153g)
 MP count low (12MP)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Landscape Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro2 Landscape photography highlights
Kodak M381 Landscape photography highlights
75
 has manual focus
 swap lenses (Fujifilm X mount)
 screen is a decent size (3 inch)
 sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
 sensor size is decent (APS-C)
 no anti aliasing filter
 saves RAW formats
 environment sealing
 has dual storage slots
 does not have image stabilization
 terrible battery (350 shots)
28
 decent sized screen (3 inches)
 focusing manually not possible
 lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 no manual exposure
 lack of image stabilization
 MP count low (12MP)
 sensor  is tiny (1/2.3")
 lack of RAW format
 missing Time Lapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-Pro2 Vlogging advice
Kodak M381 Vlogging advice
33
 includes face detection focusing
 high quality video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
 includes external mic jack
 doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
 does not have image stabilization
22
 wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
 sluggish maximum aperture (f3.0)
 screen is not selfie friendly
 lack of image stabilization
 low quality video (640 x 480 pixels)
 missing mic support
 heavier than average in class (153 grams)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	

		

			
Fujifilm X-Pro2 vs Kodak M381 Specifications

		

		

					

		
		

			Detailed spec comparison table for Fujifilm X-Pro2 and Kodak M381
 Fujifilm X-Pro2Kodak EasyShare M381
General Information
Make FujiFilm Kodak
Model type Fujifilm X-Pro2 Kodak EasyShare M381
Category Advanced Mirrorless Ultracompact
Revealed 2016-01-15 2009-07-29
Physical type Rangefinder-style mirrorless Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Processor Chip EXR Processor III -
Sensor type CMOS X-TRANS III CCD
Sensor size APS-C 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.6mm 6.08 x 4.56mm
Sensor surface area 368.2mm² 27.7mm²
Sensor resolution 24MP 12MP
Anti alias filter    
Aspect ratio 1:1, 3:2 and  16:9 4:3, 3:2 and  16:9
Full resolution 6000 x 4000 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 12800 1600
Max boosted ISO 51200 -
Minimum native ISO 200 64
RAW format    
Minimum boosted ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually    
Touch to focus    
AF continuous    
Single AF    
AF tracking    
AF selectice    
AF center weighted    
Multi area AF    
Live view AF    
Face detection AF    
Contract detection AF    
Phase detection AF    
Total focus points 273 -
Lens
Lens mount type Fujifilm X fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 35-175mm (5.0x)
Highest aperture - f/3.0-4.8
Macro focusing distance - 10cm
Total lenses 54 -
Focal length multiplier 1.5 5.9
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 3 inch
Resolution of screen 1,620 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly    
Liveview    
Touch screen    
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Electronic and Optical (tunnel) None
Viewfinder resolution 2,360 thousand dots -
Viewfinder coverage 92% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.6x -
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 8 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/8000 secs 1/1400 secs
Maximum silent shutter speed 1/32000 secs -
Continuous shooting rate 8.0 frames per second -
Shutter priority    
Aperture priority    
Expose Manually    
Exposure compensation Yes -
Custom WB    
Image stabilization    
Inbuilt flash    
Flash distance no built-in flash 3.20 m
Flash modes Auto, forced flash, slow synchro, suppressed flash, rear-curtain synchro, commander) Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash    
Auto exposure bracketing    
WB bracketing    
Maximum flash synchronize 1/250 secs -
Exposure
Multisegment    
Average    
Spot    
Partial    
AF area    
Center weighted    
Video features
Video resolutions 3840x2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25,p, 24p) 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 3840x2160 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Mic support    
Headphone support    
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth    
NFC    
HDMI    
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing    
Water proofing    
Dust proofing    
Shock proofing    
Crush proofing    
Freeze proofing    
Weight 495 gr (1.09 pounds) 153 gr (0.34 pounds)
Dimensions 141 x 83 x 56mm (5.6" x 3.3" x 2.2") 101 x 60 x 20mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 pictures -
Type of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID NP-W126 KLIC-7003
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting    
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC (Dual slots, UHS-II support in slot 1) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Card slots 2 1
Launch cost $1,700 $170