Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1
73 Imaging
71 Features
88 Overall
77
89 Imaging
48 Features
52 Overall
49
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 26MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800 (Increase to 51200)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Fujifilm X Mount
- 465g - 126 x 85 x 65mm
- Revealed October 2020
- Newer Model is Fujifilm X-S20
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 265g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Released November 2011
- Successor is Olympus E-PM2
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Overview
Its time to look much closer at the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-PM1, both Entry-Level Mirrorless cameras by brands FujiFilm and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap among the resolutions of the Fujifilm X-S10 (26MP) and E-PM1 (12MP) and the Fujifilm X-S10 (APS-C) and E-PM1 (Four Thirds) feature different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe Fujifilm X-S10 was manufactured 9 years after the E-PM1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Fujifilm X-S10 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-PM1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick summary of how the Fujifilm X-S10 matches up against the E-PM1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Fujifilm X-S10 & Olympus PEN E-PM1. The entire galleries are viewable at Fujifilm X-S10 Gallery & Olympus E-PM1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Fujifilm X-S10 over the Olympus E-PM1
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | October 2020 | November 2011 | More modern by 109 months | |
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer screen (+580k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM1 over the Fujifilm X-S10
E-PM1 | Fujifilm X-S10 |
---|
Common features in the Fujifilm X-S10 and Olympus E-PM1
Fujifilm X-S10 | E-PM1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry around your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Fujifilm X-S10 offers outer dimensions of 126mm x 85mm x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") along with a weight of 465 grams (1.03 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM1 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") with a weight of 265 grams (0.58 lbs).
Check out the Fujifilm X-S10 versus Olympus E-PM1 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the Fujifilm X-S10 vs the E-PM1.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PM1 is 73 and 89 respectively.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualize the difference in sensor sizes purely by viewing technical specs. The pic underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the Fujifilm X-S10 and E-PM1.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The Fujifilm X-S10 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Fujifilm X-S10 will render greater detail due to its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more modern Fujifilm X-S10 provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Fujifilm X-S10 vs Olympus E-PM1 Specifications
Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | FujiFilm | Olympus |
Model type | Fujifilm X-S10 | Olympus PEN E-PM1 |
Class | Entry-Level Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2020-10-15 | 2011-11-23 |
Body design | SLR-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TruePic VI |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 366.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 26MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 6240 x 4160 | 4032 x 3024 |
Max native ISO | 12800 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | 51200 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 160 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 80 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 425 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Fujifilm X | Micro Four Thirds |
Number of lenses | 54 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | - | HyperCrystal LCD AR(Anti-Reflective) coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,360 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.62x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/32000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0fps | 6.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.00 m (at ISO 200) | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, on, slow sync, manual, commander | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p / 200 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.2 Gen 1 (5 GBit/sec | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 465 grams (1.03 lb) | 265 grams (0.58 lb) |
Dimensions | 126 x 85 x 65mm (5.0" x 3.3" x 2.6") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 52 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 499 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 325 pictures | 330 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC slot (UHS-I supported) | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $999 | $499 |